Talk:Jigu: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: Should the "Ji" be hiragana like that? Also, would it be more appropriate to romanize it as Jik/Zhik?~~~~ |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should the "Ji" be hiragana like that? Also, would it be more appropriate to romanize it as Jik/Zhik?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.177|192.249.47.177]] 14:12, 1 October 2012 (EDT) | Should the "Ji" be hiragana like that? Also, would it be more appropriate to romanize it as Jik/Zhik?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.177|192.249.47.177]] 14:12, 1 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:O crap. That's what you get for not having native kana support, forcing a cumbersome copy-paste tactic. Fixed. And じ/ジ is almost always transliterated as "ji", as per modern preferences. And unless there's an obvious play on names or a word, we like to stick as close to the original Japanese as possible, which includes retaining the near-silent "u". [[User:JelZe GoldRabbit|JelZe GoldRabbit]] 14:26, 1 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:26, 1 October 2012
Should the "Ji" be hiragana like that? Also, would it be more appropriate to romanize it as Jik/Zhik?192.249.47.177 14:12, 1 October 2012 (EDT)
- O crap. That's what you get for not having native kana support, forcing a cumbersome copy-paste tactic. Fixed. And じ/ジ is almost always transliterated as "ji", as per modern preferences. And unless there's an obvious play on names or a word, we like to stick as close to the original Japanese as possible, which includes retaining the near-silent "u". JelZe GoldRabbit 14:26, 1 October 2012 (EDT)
