Talk:Shifter: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Could [[Laserbeak (DOTM)]] be considered a Shifter? I know this is Prime continuity, but Anamagoulus Prime is a multiuniversal singularity.[[Special:Contributions/71.255.169.3|71.255.169.3]] 10:54, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | Could [[Laserbeak (DOTM)]] be considered a Shifter? I know this is Prime continuity, but Anamagoulus Prime is a multiuniversal singularity.[[Special:Contributions/71.255.169.3|71.255.169.3]] 10:54, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:All he does switch alternate modes. -- [[User:Spydersix|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 10:55, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | :All he does switch alternate modes. -- [[User:Spydersix|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 10:55, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
::And hey, Amalgamous Prime is not a multiversal singularity anyway. He is only documented to exist in Aligned, not the multiverse. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 12:38, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:38, 20 October 2012
Could Laserbeak (DOTM) be considered a Shifter? I know this is Prime continuity, but Anamagoulus Prime is a multiuniversal singularity.71.255.169.3 10:54, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
- All he does switch alternate modes. -- spyderUse this! 10:55, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
- And hey, Amalgamous Prime is not a multiversal singularity anyway. He is only documented to exist in Aligned, not the multiverse. --KilMichaelMcC 12:38, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
