Talk:Second Exodus: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Starscream decpticon?
 
Spenny (talk | contribs)
→Nails and Others: new section
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Should Starscream still be listed as a Decepticon? He removed his insignia and effectively left the Decepticons to pursue his own agenda, if Jazz and Swindle and now 'others' surely old Screamer should be too? [[User:Mister Jazzz|Mister Jazz]] 08:45, 8 June 2013 (EDT)
Should Starscream still be listed as a Decepticon? He removed his insignia and effectively left the Decepticons to pursue his own agenda, if Jazz and Swindle and now 'others' surely old Screamer should be too? [[User:Mister Jazzz|Mister Jazz]] 08:45, 8 June 2013 (EDT)
== Nails and Others ==
I noticed that starting with this issue, in the featured characters section, we have stopped grouping characters like Tappet and Metalhawk under "NAILs" and have started grouping them under "Others" instead. While in the fiction the term NAIL is frowned upon by the Non-Aligned Cybertronians, the issue summaries still refer to them as such, so I can't imagine why we wouldn't continue to do the same in the featured character section. So are we sticking to NAILs, or Others?

Latest revision as of 00:52, 11 August 2013

Should Starscream still be listed as a Decepticon? He removed his insignia and effectively left the Decepticons to pursue his own agenda, if Jazz and Swindle and now 'others' surely old Screamer should be too? Mister Jazz 08:45, 8 June 2013 (EDT)

Nails and Others

[edit]

I noticed that starting with this issue, in the featured characters section, we have stopped grouping characters like Tappet and Metalhawk under "NAILs" and have started grouping them under "Others" instead. While in the fiction the term NAIL is frowned upon by the Non-Aligned Cybertronians, the issue summaries still refer to them as such, so I can't imagine why we wouldn't continue to do the same in the featured character section. So are we sticking to NAILs, or Others?