Talk:Laser core: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:It would be great if somebody familiar with the BT fiction could fix up the article, then... --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 21:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC) | :It would be great if somebody familiar with the BT fiction could fix up the article, then... --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 21:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
::If this is true, then this article really needs to be updated. The original comment was from over 6 years ago. If it is not true, someone needs to clarify here on the talk page. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 14:58, 29 September 2013 (EDT) | ::If this is true, then this article really needs to be updated. The original comment was from over 6 years ago. If it is not true, someone needs to clarify here on the talk page. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 14:58, 29 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
:::According to our page on [[GT Units Online!]], Smokescreen's tech info says the laser core is the heart of a spark. --[[User:Abates|abates]] 16:01, 29 September 2013 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:01, 29 September 2013
Binaltech confirmed everything we thought we knew about the Laser Core, it's a Force Field that keeps the Spark stable and links it with the computer systems that control memery and movement and such. No need to beat around the bush. 85.195.123.25 02:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I didn't know that. -- SFH 02:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- It would be great if somebody familiar with the BT fiction could fix up the article, then... --Steve-o 21:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- If this is true, then this article really needs to be updated. The original comment was from over 6 years ago. If it is not true, someone needs to clarify here on the talk page. --Khajidha 14:58, 29 September 2013 (EDT)
- According to our page on GT Units Online!, Smokescreen's tech info says the laser core is the heart of a spark. --abates 16:01, 29 September 2013 (EDT)
- If this is true, then this article really needs to be updated. The original comment was from over 6 years ago. If it is not true, someone needs to clarify here on the talk page. --Khajidha 14:58, 29 September 2013 (EDT)
