File talk:Minerva nekotom.jpg: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do we ''really'' have a panty shot of an adolescent girl as the primary image of a featured article? [[User:Hooper X|-hx]] 10:11, 22 October 2013 (EDT) | Do we ''really'' have a panty shot of an adolescent girl as the primary image of a featured article? [[User:Hooper X|-hx]] 10:11, 22 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
:Dear god I never noticed that. ''Eww''. I concur that this perhaps needs changing. [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] 10:30, 22 October 2013 (EDT) | :Dear god I never noticed that. ''Eww''. I concur that this perhaps needs changing. [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] 10:30, 22 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
::I'm not crazy about the style, but it is a nice piece of art insofar as it includes both the human and the transtector, and it's not just a model sheet from a magazine. That being said, maybe it can be cropped higher for underwear reasons? -[[User:LV|LV]] 10:43, 22 October 2013 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:43, 22 October 2013
Do we really have a panty shot of an adolescent girl as the primary image of a featured article? -hx 10:11, 22 October 2013 (EDT)
- Dear god I never noticed that. Eww. I concur that this perhaps needs changing. Jalaguy 10:30, 22 October 2013 (EDT)
- I'm not crazy about the style, but it is a nice piece of art insofar as it includes both the human and the transtector, and it's not just a model sheet from a magazine. That being said, maybe it can be cropped higher for underwear reasons? -LV 10:43, 22 October 2013 (EDT)
