Talk:Mistakes and Mayhem: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
Copper Bezel (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I hope it's deliberate; I thought it was cute and, indeed, apt. --[[User:MissRatbat|MissRatbat]] ([[User talk:MissRatbat|talk]]) 23:20, 22 April 2015 (EDT) | :::I hope it's deliberate; I thought it was cute and, indeed, apt. --[[User:MissRatbat|MissRatbat]] ([[User talk:MissRatbat|talk]]) 23:20, 22 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::I'd say it's fairly clear that the "Prowl" label isn't supposed to be there; on top of the fact that there are so many errors in this issue and that it doesn't mesh with previous Roll Calls, what I think cinches it for me is that it's in all-caps, when the other character "titles" use sentence case. With that in mind, should the "well it MIGHT not be an error" part be kept? I vote no. [[User:Riptide|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide|talk]]) 07:24, 23 April 2015 (EDT) | :::I'd say it's fairly clear that the "Prowl" label isn't supposed to be there; on top of the fact that there are so many errors in this issue and that it doesn't mesh with previous Roll Calls, what I think cinches it for me is that it's in all-caps, when the other character "titles" use sentence case. With that in mind, should the "well it MIGHT not be an error" part be kept? I vote no. [[User:Riptide|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide|talk]]) 07:24, 23 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
==Errors - speaking what you say== | |||
On "Uh, presumably that was supposed to be 'speak everything they think.'" - in context, that reading doesn't really make sense. Windblade is talking about subtext, so "say" means "communicate," whether directly or indirectly, as opposed to "speak," meaning to voice aloud - "think" would make the whole statement a non sequitur. | |||
It's ... kind of a clever line, actually? | |||
Revision as of 06:59, 14 May 2015
Are we sure that Prowls' descriptor on the cast page is an error? Listing his function as "Prowl" is quite apt. Howling Fist (talk) 11:55, 22 April 2015 (EDT)
Name: "Prowl", function: "Prick"... Riptide (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2015 (EDT)
- I'd be more hesitant to call it an error if the rest of the issue wasn't choked with 'em. - Chris McFeely (talk) 12:20, 22 April 2015 (EDT)
- Fair point. I'd construed it as a joke, but yeah given the rest of the issue it could easily be an error. Howling Fist (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2015 (EDT)
- I hope it's deliberate; I thought it was cute and, indeed, apt. --MissRatbat (talk) 23:20, 22 April 2015 (EDT)
- I'd say it's fairly clear that the "Prowl" label isn't supposed to be there; on top of the fact that there are so many errors in this issue and that it doesn't mesh with previous Roll Calls, what I think cinches it for me is that it's in all-caps, when the other character "titles" use sentence case. With that in mind, should the "well it MIGHT not be an error" part be kept? I vote no. Riptide (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2015 (EDT)
- Fair point. I'd construed it as a joke, but yeah given the rest of the issue it could easily be an error. Howling Fist (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2015 (EDT)
Errors - speaking what you say
On "Uh, presumably that was supposed to be 'speak everything they think.'" - in context, that reading doesn't really make sense. Windblade is talking about subtext, so "say" means "communicate," whether directly or indirectly, as opposed to "speak," meaning to voice aloud - "think" would make the whole statement a non sequitur.
It's ... kind of a clever line, actually?
