Talk:Particle cannon: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Split?== | ==Split?== | ||
When I made this page as mirror to the fusion cannon article, I didn't realize the term "particle cannon" was used for various other non-Galvatron approved weapons. I still would like to see a page solely about Galvatron's weapon, so my question now is: Would it be within the organizational system of tfwiki.net to split this into Particle cannon (Galvatron) and Particle cannon (general), or some such ambigs? [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 12:23, 23 October 2010 (EDT) | When I made this page as mirror to the fusion cannon article, I didn't realize the term "particle cannon" was used for various other non-Galvatron approved weapons. I still would like to see a page solely about Galvatron's weapon, so my question now is: Would it be within the organizational system of tfwiki.net to split this into Particle cannon (Galvatron) and Particle cannon (general), or some such ambigs? [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 12:23, 23 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
**That would be extremely silly. We should do the opposite and incorporate them all into one as usual. | **That would be extremely silly. We should do the opposite and incorporate them all into one as usual.[[User:ZTS is Very Sorry|ZTS is Very Sorry]] ([[User talk:ZTS is Very Sorry|talk]]) 21:35, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:35, 10 June 2015
"Particle cannon" doesn't entirely conflict with his toy bio. Direct-current electricity is the flow of electrons, which are particles. So in a round-about way, it all makes sense! Except for the bio also calling it a laser. - Starfield 09:11, 14 April 2010 (EDT)
Split?
[edit]When I made this page as mirror to the fusion cannon article, I didn't realize the term "particle cannon" was used for various other non-Galvatron approved weapons. I still would like to see a page solely about Galvatron's weapon, so my question now is: Would it be within the organizational system of tfwiki.net to split this into Particle cannon (Galvatron) and Particle cannon (general), or some such ambigs? Geewunling 12:23, 23 October 2010 (EDT)
- That would be extremely silly. We should do the opposite and incorporate them all into one as usual.ZTS is Very Sorry (talk) 21:35, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
