Talk:List of universal streams: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think the Primax streams can be better divided than just Major/Minor, especially since a lot of those minor streams are considerable more obscure than others. Maybe sub-headers for Beta streams, Gamma streams, etc.? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC|talk]]) 14:06, 24 July 2015 (EDT) | I think the Primax streams can be better divided than just Major/Minor, especially since a lot of those minor streams are considerable more obscure than others. Maybe sub-headers for Beta streams, Gamma streams, etc.? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC|talk]]) 14:06, 24 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Sounds good to me. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely|talk]]) 18:11, 24 July 2015 (EDT) | :Sounds good to me. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely|talk]]) 18:11, 24 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
I think it's worth repeating my suggestion that these be sorted by date that the number refers to rather than the numbers on their own here; I think it'd be easier to find things in the lists that way. Plus the numbers are basically unconventional date formats anyway, and standard practice with those is to sort chronologically... [[User:Riptide|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide|talk]]) 19:40, 25 July 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:40, 25 July 2015
I think the Primax streams can be better divided than just Major/Minor, especially since a lot of those minor streams are considerable more obscure than others. Maybe sub-headers for Beta streams, Gamma streams, etc.? --KilMichaelMcC (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2015 (EDT)
- Sounds good to me. - Chris McFeely (talk) 18:11, 24 July 2015 (EDT)
I think it's worth repeating my suggestion that these be sorted by date that the number refers to rather than the numbers on their own here; I think it'd be easier to find things in the lists that way. Plus the numbers are basically unconventional date formats anyway, and standard practice with those is to sort chronologically... Riptide (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2015 (EDT)
