Talk:A Team Effort

So, uh.....should we have a "Decepticon Warlords" category now? ---Blackout- 14:53, 1 November 2010 (EDT)

Identifiers

A few characters from the WOH continuity are disambed with (Timelines) (Bishop, Thunderblast), others with (G1). Shouldn't it all be (Timelines), or at least the same? I know Crossblades and Stilletto have (BW) identifiers, which I don't get seeing as others like them get a (Timelines) label too. And otherwise, would (WOH) be an acceptable identifier? Geewunling 13:50, 17 December 2010 (EST)

Absolutely no to "(WOH)". —Interrobang 14:25, 17 December 2010 (EST)

And going by the "(TransTech)" and "(SG)" precedent, It would seem that we send most Timelines dudes to the franchise they "belong" to. But we're still not very consistent.

The exceptions are:

• Astrotrain (Timelines) (toy)
• Bishop (Timelines) (fiction)
• Buzzclaw (Timelines) (toy)
• Cop-Tur (Timelines) (toy)
• Flareup (Timelines) (toy)
• Landquake (Timelines) (toy, no franchise to "belong" to)

We also have Ricochet (Descent into Evil), which would conflict with Ricochet (Nebulan) if moved to (G1). —Interrobang 16:34, 17 December 2010 (EST)

Bishop's problem is that there's already a G1 human named Bishop. So if we can't use "WOH", then... uh. Since he's not "Timelines", because he doesn't have a toy, and the magazine comics technically aren't Timelines fiction. --67.252.49.31 16:39, 17 December 2010 (EST)

I'm against "(WOH)" as a franchise identifier in place of "(G1)" or "(Timelines)", not as further disambiguation within a franchise. Seems to me that WOH Bishop could be "(Transformer)" and Dreamwave Bishop could be "(human)"; better parallel disambiguation tags. And yes, the comics not being Timelines is something to keep in consideration. —Interrobang 17:01, 17 December 2010 (EST)