Talk:Wolfang (Maximal)
From MediaWiki
Merge
![]() Plot details for Trigger Warnings follow. |
Trigger Warnings establishes that there is a version of the Predacon Wolfang who transforms into a Maximal. He has Maximal blue coloration in his Maximal form and Predacon red in his Predacon form. Since the two Wolfangs have never existed in the same continuity, it seems like it'd make sense to call them one and the same, since in at least one continuity they are.--Giggidy (talk) 17:17, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- They are not in Japanese continuity, where one is Howlinger and the other is "Volfang". Saix (talk) 17:22, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- But Howlinger never showed up in the Japanese continuity, right? There are no story links for him anywhere. --Giggidy (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- His Japanese bio is Japanese continuity and his toy in itself establishes the character's existence. Furthermore, "Predacon in disguise as a Maximal" doesn't make him the same character as one that's always been a Maximal. Saix (talk) 17:30, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- It's very clear from reading the story that, at least as far as Beast Wars: Uprising is concerned, Maximal and Predacon Wolfang are very much the same guy. He even renounces his Predacon heritage by the end. I don't think a Japanese toy with absolutely no fictional appearances is much or a counterargument against that. --Giggidy (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- His Japanese bio is Japanese continuity and his toy in itself establishes the character's existence. Furthermore, "Predacon in disguise as a Maximal" doesn't make him the same character as one that's always been a Maximal. Saix (talk) 17:30, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- But Howlinger never showed up in the Japanese continuity, right? There are no story links for him anywhere. --Giggidy (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
Really, Giggidy? You couldn't have waited a few more days before putting up a massive spoiler in the "Recent Changes" page? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- That's why I used the spoiler template. Isn't that what it's there for? --Giggidy (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- I don't really care about "spoilers", but the software automatically generates an edit summary for a new page based on the page's contents if you didn't enter anything into the box. So, yes, you spoiled people browsing through the recent changes page. Saix (talk) 17:45, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- Er, not sure how much this matters, but - if you're following the BWU stories, which is the main thing that would make you care about spoilers - you'd have to be pretty unobservant to not guess that "both Wolfangs are the same guy" from Burning Bridges. (Also, no to the merge. Christ no.) --Riptide (talk) 17:49, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
- I don't really care about "spoilers", but the software automatically generates an edit summary for a new page based on the page's contents if you didn't enter anything into the box. So, yes, you spoiled people browsing through the recent changes page. Saix (talk) 17:45, 3 September 2016 (EDT)


