Talk:Catilla (DOTM)

From MediaWiki
Revision as of 16:14, 31 December 2016 by Jcbynum1 (talk | contribs) (Uprising)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Should we make a note of that awful pun in his bio? ZTS is Very Sorry 14:58, 25 August 2013 (EDT)

I think people understood the pun. The disambiguation tag to the Pretender Catilla is right above the bio. --Inkblot 22:24, 25 August 2013 (EDT)

Catilla is an Maximal-allied Mini-Con from the Fire in the Dark portion of the Unicron Trilogy continuity family (via the Dark of the Moon toyline).

lol wiki -LV (talk) 00:23, 14 August 2015 (EDT)
Love it. Ascendron (talk) 02:07, 14 August 2015 (EDT)
Er, yeah, gonna agree with LV! on this one. The intent seems to be making it an Armada version of this guy, since there's several Classics Mini-Con firmly in G1 that have Armada versions in the post. Escargon (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
You mean we should create a separate page for the Aurex version or else make this page cover two continuity families? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
I'd go for separating, myself. Escargon (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
We don't need two articles for the amount of fiction it has. Notes can cover anything that needs saying about him. --Giggidy (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
I'd rather have two articles than something claiming that this was meant to be an Armada guy but was in the movie toyline. I think it's mostly okay with the Beast Wars guys to have there stuff still on their article, but this is kinda stand-out as something that probably shouldn't be done. Escargon (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
Isn't Catilla a Movie guy? I mean I think it would be better to seperate pages for Armada version and movie version.--Primestar3 (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
I'm for keeping one article, but really the continuity note should say he's BOTH a movieverse and a UT character, not the current thing that claims he's only a UT guy, with a paranthetical "via" referencing his origin in a movie toyline. Which isn't even particularly accurate, since if he's UT "via" anything, it's "via Ask Vector Prime". --KilMichaelMcC (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
I'm all for 1) keeping a single article and 2) making that continuity header less goddamn stupid. --M Sipher (talk) 22:10, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
I changed my opinion, since there's no other Mini-Con named Catilla, Vector Prime apparently retconned this character to be a Unicron Trilogy guy.--Primestar3 (talk) 13:57, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
Okay in light of this discussion, I'm soon going to edit DOTM Dualor, Rav, Triceradon, and Catilla's articles to cover both their Tyran and Aurex aspects. Any objections? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 17:34, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
I think this thing is like Mirage toy from TF Prime series. Character's toy released in a different line but still meant to represent the movie character. This is the same thing except it's a retcon.--Primestar3 (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
Considering these Mini-Cons are basically non-entities, I have to agree with Primestar3. --Ascendron (talk) 18:41, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
Are you saying that you think the DotM toy only represents an Aurex character? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 19:18, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
I'm just saying there's no real point in separating the page into two distinct ones. A note would probably suffice to clear things up. --Ascendron (talk) 19:33, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
That's exactly what I meant in my second previous post. One page two continuity families. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 19:48, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
Oops, I just misread. Sorry. --Ascendron (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2015 (EDT)

Uprising

Neither the Character List for Derailment, nor my Ctrl+F search of the story itself turns up anything on Catilla being present. Is he an unnamed guy somewhere? --Xaaron (talk) 11:10, 31 December 2016 (EST)

Try Katilla Jcbynum1 (talk) 11:14, 31 December 2016 (EST)