Talk:Micronus Prime
From MediaWiki
Split?
As we have separate pages for each member of the mainstream multiverse and Uniend incarnations of the Thirteen, and it has been indicated that significant developments may yet happen with Uniend and multiversal singularities, should we separate this into Micronus Prime (Prime) and Micronus Prime (Timelines)? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
- IIRC, the fact that significant developments are imminent is why we're holding off on making any decisions of that sort. Riptide (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
- Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at merging these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - Chris McFeely (talk) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
- Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean anything of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --M Sipher (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
- I essentially agree, as I don't expect whatever happens to change my position that these characters are "special" (read: "complicated") enough to warrant different treatment and that just giving them one article each for all their different incarnations. - Chris McFeely (talk) 17:01, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
- Bluntly, I have so little faith these these upcoming "developments" will actually mean anything of any relevance to anything but this very specific microsliver of TF yore that I doubt we'd need to change a goddamn thing, especially if we treat these as "concepts" rather than "characters" like we do for so many others. This is basically the perfect example of a "storm in a teacup". --M Sipher (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
- Indeed. It was my contention that we should be looking at merging these pages for the thirteen and treating them more like concepts, like Unicron or Primus or the Matrix or Energon, rather than doing any further splitting, but we're waiting to see how the impending changes affect that. I figure I'll probably still think the same, though. - Chris McFeely (talk) 13:06, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
Symbol?
He should have his on symbol separate from minicon.
