Talk:Grimlock (RBA)

Why is this its own article? Saix (talk) 08:19, 9 May 2019 (EDT)

Because TGB made it without waiting for outside input. Heck, unless someone can point out where the two versions we have now have been explicitly shown to be separate, I'd merge all three. --Khajidha (talk) 08:26, 9 May 2019 (EDT)

Well considering the RID writers say their Grim is separate from FOC Grim, those two stay separate. And considering this Grim is going to be in the RBA cartoon (he's been in the intro since the beginning), if he ends up being incompatible with the others as well, then yeah, making a new page was the right call. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 08:32, 9 May 2019 (EDT)

We can wait till the cartoon airs to make that decision. It's easier to split out a toy than to merge it in and delete an article. Saix (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2019 (EDT)

Have the writers shown us anything in fiction that says so? Cause "author intent" carries virtually no weight with me. --Khajidha (talk) 08:37, 9 May 2019 (EDT)