Talk:Flamewar (G1)
From MediaWiki
Shouldn't the disambig be (Timelines)? Or am I misremembering? --Detour 02:48, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
- Transformers Wiki talk:Community Portal#Moving "(Timelines)" articles —Interrobang 02:52, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
- Oh, wait, I made an exception for the Descent into Evil characters. Hurm. —Interrobang 02:53, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
Main image
I'm not about to get in a pointless edit war over this, but "first design that every single subsequent version is based on" versus "comic" is a very different situation from Lockdown and his entirely new and different billion-dollar-movie body. -LV (talk) 13:11, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- The main image from DiE does not even provide an unobscured view of Flamewar's body. Why should we not use a clearly-posed image? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- I mean, sure, there's a design throughline from that first design to the IDW2 one, but if you show the two of them to anyone who wasn't already aware of them, I guarantee you they wouldn't realise they were meant to be the same character. If your objection is that the floor-sitting one has part of the body obscured, fine (I disagree on the basis that it's characterful and there's a full-body image in the notes but won't fight for it too hard), but my point is that her original design from when she was a nonentity footnote is leagues away from the one she has in a comic that anyone's actually read.
- (Also, frankly, the IDW2 design is just plain better. I know that's a subjective opinion, I don't much care - I don't think we have a duty to use a pure redeco as a main image over an original design.) --Riptide (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- Plus IDW2 is far more relevant than DiE. The "first body" is more of a guideline that we kinda follow when we feel like it, with how many exceptions we have. I do think we should use the reference at the bottom of the page for the mainpic instead of the in front of the chair, though. --notirishman (talk) 14:22, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- Well then let's just replace every G1 character main image with their Evergreen design. After all, those are the designs that're going on tons of merchandise in thousands of stores globally right now. Or, we could... not. There's not remotely enough distance between the first iteration of Flamewar and the current IDW design to cause any sort of "confusion". And we've had the argument over "relevant" in the past, when people started wanting to put IDW comic sections at the top of characters' Fiction sections over the 80s cartoon/comic/storybooks/etc. No. --M Sipher (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- I don't think that's anything close to a fair equivalence. I mean, if we're talking evergreen designs, then isn't that exactly what's been done with Barricade (IDW)? Who, well, was a non-entity before the implementation of the newer design, unlike "every G1 character"? --Riptide (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- Also? I know you have seniority over me, but I am also an admin, and all-caps, no-room-for-discussion "NO" feels like a pretty damn disproportionate response to "maybe this image isn't perfectly representative of the character". But, hey, what-fucking-ever. --Riptide (talk) 14:36, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- This feels like something that should be codified. I think there's a clear difference between "first version of Flamewar ever, from which every design either on or off this particular page flowed", and "a movie-enough toy of an established character that was completely ignored when an actual movie came along". "First body" seems to be paramount only when it's the actual first design of a meta-character. We could make that an actual rule, or discuss alternatives. Chip (talk) 15:10, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- Argue slippery slopes all you want, but club fiction will always be less notable and accessible than mass-market media, and thus the latter should take precedent in mainpics. Otherwise, Hot Shot would still be blue. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- There is very little I want more than to forget that Fun Pub ever existed, but that's where Flamewar came from. The BotCon toy wasn't just that universe's version of an existing character. This is where I've always assumed the line was, but clearly there's disagreement. Chip (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- Argue slippery slopes all you want, but club fiction will always be less notable and accessible than mass-market media, and thus the latter should take precedent in mainpics. Otherwise, Hot Shot would still be blue. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- This feels like something that should be codified. I think there's a clear difference between "first version of Flamewar ever, from which every design either on or off this particular page flowed", and "a movie-enough toy of an established character that was completely ignored when an actual movie came along". "First body" seems to be paramount only when it's the actual first design of a meta-character. We could make that an actual rule, or discuss alternatives. Chip (talk) 15:10, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- Well then let's just replace every G1 character main image with their Evergreen design. After all, those are the designs that're going on tons of merchandise in thousands of stores globally right now. Or, we could... not. There's not remotely enough distance between the first iteration of Flamewar and the current IDW design to cause any sort of "confusion". And we've had the argument over "relevant" in the past, when people started wanting to put IDW comic sections at the top of characters' Fiction sections over the 80s cartoon/comic/storybooks/etc. No. --M Sipher (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
- Plus IDW2 is far more relevant than DiE. The "first body" is more of a guideline that we kinda follow when we feel like it, with how many exceptions we have. I do think we should use the reference at the bottom of the page for the mainpic instead of the in front of the chair, though. --notirishman (talk) 14:22, 8 September 2020 (EDT)
