Talk:Second-in-command
What the hell is this?
Just wonderin'. -hx 21:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Those whose rank are Sub-Commander usually are Second-in-Command. While people who are Second-in-Command are not necessarily in "Sub-Commander" rank. --TX55 09:10, 7 September 2007
Temporary File
Autobot Sub-Commanders
Decepticon Sub-Commanders
Predacon Sub-Commanders
- , , Triceradon, ...maybe? [TBA]
Rattrap
Jetfire (Micron Legend)
Skyfire (Superlink)
Dreadlock
Getaway
Blacker
Grandus
SkyGarry
Apache
Longrack (BWN)
Hydra Leozack Gelshark Guiledart Thrust (Micron Legend) Starscream (Galaxy Force)
Ugh
This page -- as of the time I am making this comment -- is terrible. I think it may even be worse than Sub-Commander, simply because there is more junk on it. I disagree with the assertion that Grimlock is second in command "Mainly in every continuity except for G1 Cartoon Series". The references are not nearly specific enough. "Rhinox - He has the ability for leadership" doesn't belong. A simple list format is not going to cut it in more complex cases. Cheetor, for example, was second-in-command during BM, which is actually given a specific citation, but he obviously was not highly-ranked in BW. Cases like that need to be explained right there in the body of the list. Also the English stinks, and the article should be moved to Second-in-command. I know it would be more productive to fix things myself rather than just complain, but there is so much wrong here that I don't have tha patience for it. All that said, I support the idea of this catchall page existing in place of the other articles. --Steve-o 22:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
