Talk:Lift-Ticket (Diaclone)
Split proposal
So, I just got Selects Lift-Ticket and was wondering about its pronouns (it/it/its, apparently). I noticed there was a split proposal for this article, but there wasn't even a talk page started, let alone a discussion of it. Please note, I didn't propose this split.
So, addressing the question of splitting this article, I would say no, at least for now. This article is still quite short, and splitting it between the Diaclone and (notionally) G1 sections would give us two even shorter articles, one consisting of the brief fiction section, the other of the brief toys section. At this point, there's no real need for this split.
Furthermore, the toys may be from G1-focused lines, but one was a Bot-Con exclusive where the fiction clearly had it coming from the Diaclone part of the multiverse, while the other is from Generations which has already featured bots from non-G1 continutities (Hot Shot, Armada Starscream, Galaxy Upgrade Optimus Prime, plus the Prime related toys announced for Legacy), so Lift-Ticket's inclusion there does not necessarily imply being a part of G1. Waverod ✈️ (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2022 (EST)
Yeah, I don't think we should be against short articles if they make sense, but given the complete lack of bio and fiction we're getting for the Legacy-associated Diaclone lines, combined with how it's being more multiversal than WFC's 'G1 all the time' approach, do we actively gain anything by splitting them? AkibaSilver (talk) 19:19, 1 March 2022 (EST)
- I agree with Waverod and Akiba, for all the reasons given. Splitting this just gives us two worse articles instead of one better one. (Plus, like, it's not like Lift-Ticket came with any copy that said it WASN'T actually a person and not some mech-piloted thing.) ((unfortunately)) --ItsWalky (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2022 (EST)

