Talk:Aximili-Esgarrouth-Isthill
From MediaWiki
Is this "full name" the article's been moved to found on his toy packaging? --KilMichaelMcC 14:29, 28 September 2009 (EDT)
- I don't know, but I think it was decided the wiki isn't going to be that hyper-strict about willfully ignoring crossover fiction. - Starfield 14:45, 28 September 2009 (EDT)
- When it makes sense not to, like not pretending Reed Richards isn't part of the Fantastic Four because it's not explicitly said. This is just... pointless. - Chris McFeely 14:57, 28 September 2009 (EDT)
- Yeah, if this is the character's full name from the Animorphs books and isn't mentioned on any toy packaging, then it shouldn't be the article's title, as this Wiki isn't really interested in anything from said books. Frankly, I still find having individual Animorphs pages at all to be somewhat dubious, and would prefer if all Animorphs info was collected in a single article. --KilMichaelMcC 15:53, 28 September 2009 (EDT)
- Anyway, I checked around, and actually the full name IS in the toy's bio, so changing the article title is fine. But, I am still in favor of a consolidation of all the Animorphs pages into a single article. --KilMichaelMcC 15:45, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
- Why would we do that? That's not how we treat other non-Hasbro-owned properties that they licensed for TF toys. --ItsWalky 16:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
- It would be because Animorphs have absolutely no connections of any kind to Transformers proper. I would have suggested the same for the Star Wars TFs, except we got the Galactic Showdown stuff with official artwork of TF and SW characters interacting. --KilMichaelMcC 16:53, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
- Why would we do that? That's not how we treat other non-Hasbro-owned properties that they licensed for TF toys. --ItsWalky 16:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
- Anyway, I checked around, and actually the full name IS in the toy's bio, so changing the article title is fine. But, I am still in favor of a consolidation of all the Animorphs pages into a single article. --KilMichaelMcC 15:45, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
- Yeah, if this is the character's full name from the Animorphs books and isn't mentioned on any toy packaging, then it shouldn't be the article's title, as this Wiki isn't really interested in anything from said books. Frankly, I still find having individual Animorphs pages at all to be somewhat dubious, and would prefer if all Animorphs info was collected in a single article. --KilMichaelMcC 15:53, 28 September 2009 (EDT)
- When it makes sense not to, like not pretending Reed Richards isn't part of the Fantastic Four because it's not explicitly said. This is just... pointless. - Chris McFeely 14:57, 28 September 2009 (EDT)
