Talk:Breakdown (G1)

From MediaWiki
Revision as of 18:48, 20 January 2010 by Bowspearer (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Since there's only one guy actually named 'Breakdown', would there be any objections to moving the page to Breakdown? - RolonBolon 06:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm in favor of it. --Andrusi 20:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Does anyone have any evidence of the alledged "gold hood sticker" on Classics Breakdown? I bought my UK version off the shelves back then, and it was (and still is) red... --Fighbird 10:17, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

Ok I'm not sure if this falls under the category of strange, pety or a little of both. As soon as I read TF Ongoing issue 1, I immediately added that to the wiki entry for breakdown. Anyway a couple of months back I check back only to find that the entry has completely changed to a less detailed one but also that my account had been deleted. If someone wanted to make style changes here and there fine, I can understand that (I even referenced it as being Tf Ongoing 1 so that when the synopsis was done for it, it could be crosslinked- that reference was soon deleted by another member). But short of some weird mystical glitch where the site somehow maqnaged to lose member data; to not only go for a less detailed account of the section but to also remove my account for reporting FACTUAL information, smacks of childish petiness and the ego and maturity of a 5 year old on the part of the individual who did it. Just because we collect a toy line marketted to 5 year olds doesn't mean that people on here have to act like them!