You probably installed from Git, or directly from the source code using some other method. This is expected. Try installing some skins from mediawiki.org's skin directory, by:
Downloading the tarball installer, which comes with several skins and extensions. You can copy and paste the skins/ directory from it.
Downloading individual skin tarballs from mediawiki.org.
I found a different description for the episode that is pretty much the same except it says the Nemesis becomes sentient. Shouldn't the description be changed on here?
So is the speaking thing supposed to be Trypticon, or the Nemesis's computer? -- SFH 23:43, 28 April 2012 (EDT)
It's left open to interpretation. The intelligence is not named or explained in any way, and is credited as "Warship". --abates 00:12, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
The wiki seems to be assuming it is Trypticon, going by the Trypticon (Prime) page... should we be? 118.93.48.54 22:36, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
My thoughts exactly. We do not have any confirmation that the Nemesis IS Trypticon. And it still remains fairly ambiguous whether Exiles is to be taken into account or not. Rayqui 03:18, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
Agreed. The Warship hasn't even been named on the show, so who knows if it is in fact "The Nemesis", yet alone Trypticon. I don't think 'EXODUS' or 'EXILES' should be viewed as the Prime 'bible', as TF novels are notorious for being ignored by other media. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.118.37.154 (talk • contribs){{#if:23:06, 30 April 2012 (EDT)| 23:06, 30 April 2012 (EDT)|}}.
One: sign your posts. Two: get your facts right. The Nemesis HAS been named before. -- Spydersix 23:14, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
But the Nemesis has never been named "Trypticon", or even alluded to, in TF Prime. The merge was really too hasty. Rayqui 08:33, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
Can further discussion of the issue please be held on Talk:Trypticon (Prime) since that's the article it concerns? --abates 16:34, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
Voice actor
Who voices the Nemesis anyway?71.255.166.246 23:54, 28 April 2012 (EDT)
Kevin Michael Richardson. --abates 00:12, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
Soundwave
Soundwave also shows signs of sentience, since the beginning he has only showed his opposition to Airachnid's command back in Orion Pax.
Now, when Trypticon ( or the Nemesis ) gave Megs a headache just like Unicron did, and Megatron said to regain control of the vessel, Soundwave acts weirdly, he tries to set things back quickly, as opposed to everything he has done before, he does everything smoothly and without any hurrying.
Does this need to be pointed ?
--User:SnipinScientist , 29 April 2012
Uh, when was it ever claimed that Soundwave is non-sentient? --abates 18:32, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
Dark Energon
Since Unicron has been killed, neutralised to vapor, whatever, shouldn't Dark Energon be useless ? And Why did they stop searching for other deposits and using it ? --User:SnipinScientist , 29 April 2012
Why would Dark Energon be useless if Unicron is dead? There's no evidence it requires his will to revive the dead. --abates 18:34, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
WTC
Sorry if this seems like a stupid question, but should it be noted that this is the first time the World Trade Center has been seen in a Transformers cartoon since 9/11? -- Spydersix 21:09, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
Does the WTC actually appear? I don't see it in the shot of Manhattan at the end. --abates 22:51, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
Look carefully at the last shot, it's over on the left side. It's the tower under construction that comes from under a cloud. -- Spydersix 22:54, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
It's also in the first half a second of the Tunnel Vision promo. -- Spydersix 22:59, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
So are we noting it? -- Spydersix 18:33, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
If it can be proven with a screenshot.--Carrion 16:47, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
Why is this something that absolutely needs to be noted? —Interrobang 17:03, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
Carrion- Here it is. Interrobang- otherpeople seem to think its worthy to note, so..... -- Spydersix 17:07, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
I'm finding myself agreeing with Interrobang. There really is no reason to make a big deal out of this. --Khajidha 17:09, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
It woulda been notable if they'd accidentally used a shot with the old WTC in. The new one, probably not. --abates 17:23, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
Okay. I'll still put in the picture, without the circle, just because the article needs images. -- Spydersix 17:30, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
Regardless, those black bars shouldn't be there in the final image. --ItsWalky 17:32, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
A contextless picture of Manhattan isn't an useful image for an episode's page. —Interrobang 17:50, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
