Talk:Unicron/toys

Was Dead End (Armada) included in the Universe 2008 release? - Starfield 01:11, 4 May 2010 (EDT)

Yep. Khajidha 07:19, 4 May 2010 (EDT)

Japanese franchise

My thinking is that Japan never really had anything called "Generation 1" (even retroactively) as far as I know. So Japanese exclusive toys shouldn't go under a "Generation 1" heading. It should go with what the Japanese called it. In the case of the new exclusive and the canceled Japanese toy that would be "Transformers 2010". Primus's toy was put under Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers for that reason. - Starfield 17:24, 24 May 2010 (EDT)

Prime's toy was put under Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers because he has no American toy under "Transformers" or "Generation 1" or however you call it. For comparison, both Micron Legend and Armada Hot Shot toys are grouped under "Armada." When there is no American toy equivalent, that is when we use the Japanese franchise name. --ItsWalky 18:04, 24 May 2010 (EDT)

Welcome to Transformers 2010

TakaraTomy seem to pretty consistently call this thing "Welcome to Transformers 2010", including packaging. Should we put Unicron, Convoy Sleep Mode and the Sons of Cybertron set under this banner instead of the Japanese Generation 1 TF 2010 line? --FFN 01:42, 18 June 2010 (EDT)

Ark Unicron

Does the new deco of this mold mention the "armor" pieces on his legs at all in the instructions? And if so, what precisely are they for? It's something that's been bugging me since the figure originally came out for Cybertron, and I think if there's some sort of concept/reason/whatever behind it it's worth mentioning at least as trivia. --72.215.154.250 11:04, 5 April 2012 (EDT)

Gold Plastic Syndrome on Gaia Unicron

It looks like it, every review I've seen of him makes note the gold parts are brittle and show signs of stress under pressure. Should we make note of that on the page?