User talk:Lush City
You will contribute in some other way than wanting to reorganize our wiki in ways everyone else disagrees with. You will, or you will be gone. Accept that you have lost, and move on. If you do not move on, again, the bye-ness. It will happen. --ItsWalky 10:52, 8 December 2011 (EST)
Also:
Oh I most certainly will, it's just that I joined on to discuss the IDW concept (one brought up before) and the ensuing concept just kind of , sucked all the appointed "TF WIki" allotted space in my brain straight to it. While I obviously think that under our current standards IDW shouldn't be G1 (and have provided evidence of such) counter evidence has been proposed, and in the absence of any concrete exodus outside community consensus it will obviously be more productive to the wiki if I move on to other ventures. Putting debate into conetextes of "winning" and "losing" just enforces making things personal instead of about the wiki. I accept that what I thought was best for the wiki wasnt shared by enough people to warrant a change, so I'l move onto something else. No one "wins" or "looses." Being a wiki editor isn't a competition. I wont push an argument further if it is futile, especially f it would result in discipline from the wiki authorities. --Lush City 7:54, 9 December 2011 (EST)
Community portal
Do not censor other people's instances of swearing on community talk pages. It is not your text to alter. --Monzo 02:10, 9 January 2012 (EST)
Ohmygosh I am Soooo sorry, I wsd editing on my sisters computer and I geuss its autocensors affected the eedit field, I didnot know it could do that. My bad Lush City 18:12, 9 January 2012 (EST)
Heat Scramble
Regarding your Heat Scramble inquiry, the approach I would suggest would be to follow the example set by our board game pages, a la the Beast Wars Transformers Mutating Card Game or Adventure Game: Defeat the Decepticons; describe the basic gameplay rules, then list the cards. --Monzo 04:28, 11 January 2012 (EST)
Go! Franchise Page Edits
Just to clarify (because I don't like people undoing my edits, and I'm sure you don't either):
- - "号" is a really unlikely kanji for "gō" in this context. There are a LOT of possible kanji that fit the syllable "gō"; there's no need to mention all of them. Heck - the need to mention any of them is debatable in my opinion, but if we're mentioning any, let's limit it to the REALLY likely ones.
- - While "gō" IS spelled "ごう" in kana, that's already signified through the use of "ō" instead of "o". As much as I disagree with using Hepburn romanization, that IS the standard the wiki has decided to go with. Furthermore, even if there WERE a need to clarify the spelling, doing so in kana probably doesn't help the people who might actually benefit from clarification. In this case, the clarification doesn't really add anything.
That being said, always happy to have someone else interested in Japanese running around the wiki!--BraveMax (talk) 05:42, 5 December 2013 (EST)
