Talk:Aurex 405.0 Epsilon

Untitled

Okay, I don't think this is what was meant at all in the Andromeda post. First off, if this was for the Cybertron fiction, it would've used the first club mags date. Secondly, Nenesis Prime doesn't come from this universe, and the fact that it's still formatted the way it is on the Andromeda post makes me feel as though it's indicating some Unicronian pocket dimmension. I mean, Nemesis may be a clone of a Primaxian-ish Prime, but he never had a specific universe to himself. Escargon (talk) 04:07, 23 May 2015 (EDT)

And I thought that the Unicron Singularity never got to expand out of Aurex 802.23 Alpha. Plus, the Balancing Act arc, building directly into the Cybertron cartoon, features multiversal singularity Vector Prime himself. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 19:56, 23 May 2015 (EDT)

...There are at least three different universes detailed on the Unicron Singularity page. Saix (talk) 00:41, 24 May 2015 (EDT)

Escargon, for god's sake. "Aurex 000.0X405.0 Epsilon" is clearly not meant to be an actual universe. It's an indicator of Nemesis Prime's extrauniversal Unicronian origin (000.0) and helps the reader specify which character it is (405.0 Epsilon). Saix (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2015 (EDT)

Alright then. But I'd still take contention with 405.0 Epsilon being the Cybertron FunPub stuff, since they start the magazine before. Escargon (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2015 (EDT)

...Because that's when the continuity was properly introduced! The first issue is just Vector Prime mucking around the multiverse and explaining stuff. Saix (talk) 18:19, 4 June 2015 (EDT)

The first issue ends with him popping near Cybertron in "Cybertron" though. It's colored grey instead of gold, but it's obviously meant to be from "Cybertron". Escargon (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2015 (EDT)

Yes, I said "properly introduced". The Classicsverse is numbered after the publishing date of the first part of Crossing Over despite actually appearing at the end of Revelations Part 6, for example. Saix (talk) 18:29, 4 June 2015 (EDT)

..Okay, yeah, you're probably right. I concede. Escargon (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2015 (EDT)