Talk:Beast (G1)

Why is he called the Beast? Well, look at him. He's certainly not the Beauty. --Andrusi 23:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Why is it that everyone seems to hate this guy? Is it just because he's ugly? Something can be ugly or grotesque and awesome as well, like the Alien or most of the monsters from Doom or even... Doom 3. --LokitheGrammarNazi 14:23, 26 October 2010 (EDT)

Because half the fanbase came up with better Dinobot combiners in 1985? --Khajidha 14:31, 26 October 2010 (EDT)

Because it's simultaniously increadibly fan-wanky to the point of bad fan-wank cliche and horribly executed on its own merit. --99.75.104.99 14:44, 26 October 2010 (EDT)

Unleash The Beast

What are you TALKING about?! The Beast is AWESOME!--Keepcalm&rollout (talk) 09:29, 21 May 2014 (EDT)

I agree. It's primal and beastly (which is what one would expect). It fits the Dinobots perfectly. I really don't see why everyone's jimmies are rustled. ---Lord of Hate (talk) 11:02, 18 October 2014 (EDT)

Volcanicus

Do we have the two on the same page, since it's basically the same thing, or...? Saix (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2017 (EDT)

Strikethrough Text

What happened to the Strikethrough text in the description? It was hilarious and I enjoyed it. Haven13 (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2017

"He is also an aesthetic nightmare of broken robot parts, most of which can't clearly be recognized as part of any Dinobot."

What the heck does the article mean by that? The shins are the same as on Volcanicus, the forearms are the same as on Volcanicus (but with Swoop's wings removed), and the main hub body is from Grimlock. At best the thighs aren't clearly from a specific component, but that hardly justifies the claim made.KrytenKoro (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2020 (EDT)