Talk:Breastforce

Hm. I forget... is Deathsaurus himself considered (officially) part of Breastforce? What with him having the gimmick and all? And should there be a BF category, since there's at least nine articles that'd qualify even without Deathy? (Fifteen if the breastplate partners get their own articles, eighteen id deathy & crew count.) --M Sipher 20:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I was always under the impression that he was, I just forgot to add him to the article.

http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/manwood/484/TF/Victory.html#Deszaras

A translation of his tech spec, says he's the "mightiest warrior of the Breast Force". --DrSpengler 20:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Anglicanization

The trivia claims that the name was Anglicanized as "Brest" for a particular reason:

The Breastforce team name was consistently misanglicized as "Brestforce" on every English instance of the name on packaging and tech spec materials due to "breast" having [ahem] unwanted non-robotic connotations.{{#if:|{{{quote2}}}}}{{#if:|{{{2}}}{{#if:|, {{{3}}}|}}|}}

This sounds like bullshit to me. I would have just assumed they misspelled it. Is there any source for this claim? --Steve-o 17:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Sounds like complete bullshit to me. I've seen waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much misspelled English on Japanese products to buy the notion any of it is intentional. --M Sipher 18:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm late to the party here, but wouldn't "Beast Force" work a whole lot better as a replacement name? The 'breast' partners are all animals, and it actually means something unlike Brest. -Cattleprod 23:46, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

We're not renaming anything, and I don't see where you got that impression. —Interrobang 23:58, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

Sorry, I might've phrased that badly. I just meant that if SOMEONE was intentionally renaming the thing, Beast would work better than Brest, supporting the theory that it's just a bad translation. -Cattleprod 00:06, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

Okay, then why did you contribute to a two year old conversation that was already resolved? —Interrobang 00:08, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

Because the 'Beast' thing struck me as incredibly obvious and I needed to express it SOMEWHERE. My moments of insight are few and far between, y'know? -Cattleprod 00:57, 22 April 2009 (EDT)