Talk:Clone number 3370318

Do we really need the noname-designation templates for these clones? I mean, even though they're just numbers, couldn't they be considered official, "real" names? -Mazenoise 10:09, 3 September 2009 (EDT)

Presumably all the clones also have a number. Some also have actual names. "Clone number 3370318" is pretty much the definition of a "designation." - Starfield 10:20, 3 September 2009 (EDT)

Him being clone #3370318 probably doesn't mean there are at least 3,370,138 clones, right? Just had to ask. - Starfield 21:49, 22 September 2009 (EDT)