Talk:Dreamwave-verse
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Uh, guys, given that "Sideways" isn't even really reading some of these questions too carefully before giving off-the-cuff not-helpful may-be-lying answers, perhaps making pages for Universe Streams that questioners ask isn't such a good idea.--Jimsorenson (talk) 01:42, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
- I really only added this to the list because Dreamwave G1 was one of the biggest gaps left. Not doing the Grand Scourge one since it's actually the wrong numbering, it's insignificant, and there isn't any commentary on the universe itself. Saix (talk) 01:47, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
- I'd say if it's published on the page, whether Sideways acknowledges it or not, it's technically canon. Escargon (talk) 01:51, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
- I wouldn't say just because Sideways acknowledges the question means that the question's contents are fictionally valid. Saix (talk) 01:54, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
- Transfer Point had the wrong date for the numbering system, if need be, this could be corrected in the future at some point. Escargon (talk) 01:56, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
- I wouldn't say just because Sideways acknowledges the question means that the question's contents are fictionally valid. Saix (talk) 01:54, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
- I'd say if it's published on the page, whether Sideways acknowledges it or not, it's technically canon. Escargon (talk) 01:51, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
For what it's worth, it's certainly an intellectually defensible position to keep this one and nix the one about Scourge, given that "Sideways" put at least a tiny bit of thought into the question about the DW universe and clearly none at all into the latter. "Sure, why not?" is obviously just blowing off the question.--Jimsorenson (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2015 (EDT)

