Talk:Dungeons & Dinobots

Side Burn

I love the idea of RID Side Burn ending up in SG after the Universe comics, but I'm having problems. Why is Side Burn his RID self, but, according to this wiki, Demolishor is just some SG version of the character?

"he already had an Earth mode" - Not quite right. He altered his form in anticipation of the Decepticons' journey to Earth, just like many other Autobots, including Goldbug and Rodimus.

"so far he's the only character, short of Crasher and Demolishor, who isn't based on someone from G1" - In other words, he's not the only character who isn't based on G1. A spoiler for Eye in the Sky, the latest club story: ----------- Fred & Billy appear, mirror counterparts to the Armada characters. The list of non-G1 characters is growing. The authors of Do Over specifically mention that G1 Cliffjumper doesn't know of a G1 counterpart to SG Demolishor. Does this mean that SG Demolishor is actually Armada Demolishor, or that SG isn't wholly alternate-G1? Just some thoughts that have been stewing in my head for a while. --Crockalley 15:21, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

So, to revive this discussion: Shouldn't he be SG Side Burn until he's revealed to be RID Side Burn? I see the evidence, but there's still some gray room. And even in the face of "it's so obvious!", isn't it kind of a spoiler to say so here for those who wouldn't have guessed? I mean, I'm fine with the trivia note, but unequivocally stating that he's RID Side Burn in the Featured Characters list makes me uncomfortable. --Crockalley 14:13, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

Spoilers for what? This story? Then don't read the page. --ItsWalky 14:22, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

Spoiler for any future story that explicitly revels that he's RID Side Burn, assuming they're building up to such a revelation. And if they're not, then I'm not so sure about absolutely stating that he's RID Side Burn. --Crockalley 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

If it's obvious from the story itself, it's not a spoiler for a future story. --ItsWalky 19:20, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

Alright, this is ridiculous. My edit to the Featured Characters section has been reverted, and yet, the link to the SG Side Burn article at the top of the page remains. Which Side Burn are we assuming this is? ---Blackout- 16:11, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

I would imagine that's a leftover from my synopsis some weeks ago that Walky hasn't notice yet. --Crockalley 18:44, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

Chromedome

What is this I hear about an SG Chromedome in D&D? ---Blackout- 05:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

Near the end of the story, Prime threatened to hang Blurr on "the shelf" next to Cromedome for failing to capture Grimlock.

“Tell me why I shouldn’t rid myself of your incompetence, and let you join Chromedome on the shelf. You two will have a lot to talk about for a very long time.”

--Crockalley 14:49, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

Where to Put the Preview?

So I ordered a couple back issues of the TFCC mag recently and was a bit surprised to find that the preview for this story in issue #22 actually is a whole scene that's not in the actual text story. So... I'm thinking it should get summarized somewhere, but wasn't sure where in relation to this page. --Jeysie 19:13, 15 October 2009 (EDT)

Another error?

One of the newly-intelligent Grimlock's lines is "Like most precarious children, I am merely bored." Isn't this a malapropism of the word "precocious?" "Precarious" would mean in danger, and is normally only used towards situations or places, not individuals. HydraDW 04:11, 30 July 2012 (EDT)