Talk:Living metal
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Merged discussion from "Talk:Cyber-matter"
[edit]I nearly asked this on the Evolution talk page: why are we capitalizing "Cyber Matter"? -LV 15:04, 4 July 2013 (EDT)
- Also, is it meant to be two words? I've seen many spell it as "Cybermatter". Anyone checked the Closed captions? --Sabrblade 19:16, 4 July 2013 (EDT)
- Also also, I wonder if we might want to contemplate a merger of some kind with Technomatter. They both seem to be descriptors for the living metal of Cybertron. - Chris McFeely 19:24, 4 July 2013 (EDT)
- Merging them sounds like a good idea. And I believe the captions parse it as "cyber-matter". (But then, they also use "cyber-nucleic acid", so....) - Sean Whitmore 22:24, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
- Setting aside the merge proposal as a separate issue, is it OK to re-parse this as cyber-matter? - Starfield 11:16, 23 July 2013 (EDT)
- Merging them sounds like a good idea. And I believe the captions parse it as "cyber-matter". (But then, they also use "cyber-nucleic acid", so....) - Sean Whitmore 22:24, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
- Also also, I wonder if we might want to contemplate a merger of some kind with Technomatter. They both seem to be descriptors for the living metal of Cybertron. - Chris McFeely 19:24, 4 July 2013 (EDT)
Merged discussion from "Talk:Transformium"
[edit]I'm not sure I agree with the assessment that the difference between how ordinary TFs transform and the magic swirling blocks deal that the KSI built bots use is a matter of living vs non-living, spark vs no spark. I thought the idea was that KSI had decoded the "genome" of Transformium (whatever that means) and thus were making a more advanced use of it's properties than what regular Transformers do. --KilMichaelMcC (talk) 10:52, 5 July 2014 (EDT)
Goo
[edit]I just wanna say the phrase "sufficient quantities of goo" is endlessly hilarious to me. --M Sipher (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2017 (EDT)