Talk:Mister Johnson

"Mister"

"Mister" replaced nothing. It's "Mister Branson" in the original version and the only way we got "Richard Branson" was the lead paragraph for the issue.

PS: The strikethrough of everything isn't funny. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Saix (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2018 (EST)

Walky was clearly speaking in jest when he said Mister replaced Richard, but there's no real reason this article can't be at Mister Johnson anyway. And besides, is this really something you wanna pick a fight with the owner of the site over?

PS: Yes it is. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -Foffy (talk) 17:40, 28 November 2018 (EST)

Saix, for once in your life could you not be a joyless robot and accept that not everything has to follow a rigid set of immutable guidelines? - Chris McFeely (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2018 (EST)

Should we merge this with the other page?

Does anyone else think that we should combine this article with the one on Richard Branson? I know that they're technically separate people since one is a real British billionaire and the other is a lookalike meant to dodge lawsuits for using his likeness, but minus the strikethroughs, they're pretty much the exact same article. It feels weird having two articles like this, and if we can't merge them, are we at least able to rewrite one to feel a little more unique from the other? Thanks. GoodMudkip (talk) 21:21, 29 April 2022 (EDT)

No. Saix (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2022 (EDT)

Indeed. Being the same article is exactly the point. That's the joke. We're not merging them. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2022 (EDT)