Talk:Monsterous

Spelling

Given that the actual name of the combiner was "Monsterous" (see the packaging picture here http://counter-x.net/gobots/reviews/combiners/monsterous.html) and this was also the spelling used in CyKill's post on 16 October when he gave us the origin of these characters, shouldn't we move this page to Monsterous?--Khajidha (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2015 (EDT)

Merging Monsterous

Idea keeps coming up, so: should we mergee Monsterous' components into this single Monsterous page? There's not much to each 'Predacon' and it seems like a lot of people are in favour of condensing it. --Charles RB (talk) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (GMT)

In this case, I think that would be a good idea. Monsterous's component parts only have a narrative importance because of their relationship to Monsterous. "Related characters" section at the bottom of the page? --Ascendron (talk) 16:10, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Sounds good to me. --Charles RB (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (GMT)

Even that seems unnecessary. A simple list of components with a brief personality description, like we do for combiner teams pages, seems to be all that's warranted. One collective fiction section can describe their individual activities in the single battle. - Chris McFeely (talk) 16:36, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

I'm fine with either. --Ascendron (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (EDT)

Merge seems like a good idea. --Giggidy (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2015 (EDT)