Talk:Razorclaw (SG)
Is there any particular reason we don't have their robot-mode images as their "main" images, seeing as they're really the only ones we have? It's not like we can't move them down later when art comes through. --M Sipher 06:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Nice caption
[edit]Hee hee hee hee hee. I love the "It's totally cool" caption. It took me a second to get it, but that made it completely worthwhile. Run, gag, run! - Jackpot 06:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
In the "not an homage" camp, I'm 90% sure Razorclaw is actually metal-flake gold, by the way. --M Sipher 15:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I was stunned to see a Razorclaw page turn up 0 results when I control-F'd for the obligatory reference. Then I looked a little closer. - DuplexBeGreat (talk) 00:12, 6 July 2017 (EDT)
Mini-Con status
[edit]When was Razorclaw ever identified as a Mini-Con? —Interrobang 22:42, 9 December 2010 (EST)
- Wasn't there something or another in the Allspark Almanac II that said all toys with Mini-Con molds were Mini-Cons, at least in the Quadwal universe? I can't remember the specifics, and I can't access the Annotated Allspark right now. 72.35.60.2 11:12, 10 December 2010 (EST)
- I don't think his status in the Quadwal universe would have relevance to his page, since it'd just be fancy Transformers-nerddom-speak for "these toys are Mini-Cons in real life." --ItsWalky 11:35, 10 December 2010 (EST)
- I mostly just ask because the other SG Predacons aren't in the category. If only their toys are Mini-Cons, then that still counts since we also record toy information, I guess. —Interrobang 12:54, 10 December 2010 (EST)
- I don't think his status in the Quadwal universe would have relevance to his page, since it'd just be fancy Transformers-nerddom-speak for "these toys are Mini-Cons in real life." --ItsWalky 11:35, 10 December 2010 (EST)