Talk:Robot Resource

Do we even need this as a separate article? Surely we can just add it onto Jackpot's Robots Video Arcade article. --FFN 04:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

• That's up to you guys. Personally, I think each individual thing should have its own article, but that's just my POV. At the very least, this should be a redirect.Thanos6 04:44, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

But nobody would ever search for "Robot Resource", and the only articles that would possibly refer to it are Spike Witwicky, Carly and the episode's article, and they'll most likely link to the arcade's article anyway. --FFN 08:43, 20 October 2009 (EDT)

We might as well delete the articles for Canyon Racer XL and Ninja Gladiator then too, they're also pretty bloody minor. But I say no; we're not Wikipedia and we don't have to be bound by their accursed notability rule. Thanos6 05:52, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

I think my criterion is, "Is there anything more substantial to say about X other than that it exists?" In this case, there's zero served by a separate article that the Robots Video Arcade doesn't cover. In the "Ninja Gladiator" article, at least, the game serves as a plot point and there's no suitable other article to add the information to, so it doesn't warrant deletion. (I do agree with the thought of making the individual games in this case redirects, though.) --Jeysie 06:32, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Well, this article tells what kind of gameplay the game had, which doesn't really fit in the arcade article. Thanos6 07:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Why wouldn't it fit? A one-line blurb about each game would fit... and is what this article pretty much has. --Jeysie 07:04, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

"First goal"?

Is it "first goal" or "first go"? Flicky1991 15:19, 6 August 2012 (EDT)