Talk:Supreme

I question the neccessity of individual articles for different "size classes", espeically since prices and designations change from line to line (and market to market, for that matter). A single article that covers the whole schebang, I think, should suffice. --M Sipher 23:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree. There isn't enough to say about any one size class to justify separate articles. There should, however, be redirection articles at each size class name that points to the "real" article which covers them all. --Steve-o 23:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

THe real question is how we orginize it. I think it would be easyest to sort by the "standard" names, (the mega section also covers voyagers and Maxcons), with US price. Sorting by US price or actual size (listing BW Ultras with UT Megas) would be a problem, as the price shift not only removed the $15 price point, but replaced the $30 pricepoint with the $25 pricepoint. Also, the UT Ultras are bigger than PRE-UT Ultras, but smaller than the pre-UT Supers. --FortMax 00:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Eh, whatever you guys like. I put up all of the names to take the easy way out of deciding which name is more valid than the other. Should the $20 pricepoint be primarily called Ultra, Mega, Maxcon, or Voyager? Stuff like that. Maybe have separate sections by toyline that explains what the size classes in that toyline are? Seems like the least confusing way. Singularity 00:26, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

What should the article be named? Size class or Pricepoint? Singularity 00:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I think I've heard both terms used by Hasbro people, so I don't have much of a preference between the two. I do recommend though that whichever we choose, the other one be created as a redirect. I imagine people will search for both terms from time to time. --Steve-o 01:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)