User talk:Peter Damian

{{#if:Juvenal|

(Answer: No-one.)

Blocked and insulted at the same time

Dude, I knew who you were the second you started editing, because the very first things you did were to get pointlessly, disproportionately angry at someone, and to act like you were the self-appointed "wiki police" when you've never done anything to deserve that kind of consideration - everything you always did under your old username. I was content to not bring it up if you were going to act like a sensible, productive member of the community, but as all you seem to now be doing is making snide out-of-the-corner-of-your-mouth remarks about how you've "tricked" us - you didn't, and you're banned. - Chris McFeely 13:01, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

"never done anything to deserve that kind of consideration"

94 articles and over 2000 edits over a two-year period. I like to think that's something.

Oh, but of course! Once you disagree with the mob, it doesn't matter if you're a long-time editor or a troll! --Peter Damian 13:13, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

Dude, you got banned after going H-bomb over the Goldbug toy. I agreed with your original point, but it really wasn't worth making a big deal out of. In fact, you seemed to get overly upset over things quite often. Including now. Calm down. --Khajidha 13:17, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

PS to McFeely - can you block IP 142.227.196.129, he admits to being banned User:TOM. --Khajidha 13:18, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

"H-bomb" meaning "revert-warring to introduce sanity into an article then leaving when somebody deemed it necessary to ban me with a false reason". --Peter Damian 13:19, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

Revert warring with an admin and going on a vandalism spree. --Khajidha 13:20, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

1. Interrobang, Geewunling and Starfield are admins now?

2. That came after, and I apologized for it. --Peter Damian 13:22, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

1. Sorry, revert warring against the express wishes of an admin (ItsWalky). I disagree with him and agree with you, but it is pointless to edit war over something he disagrees with. You have to convince him or gain consensus among the rest of the site members.

2. I was dating the start of it to your "Needs moar truth" edit which came before the ban. --Khajidha 13:28, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

Buster, you have always had an attitude. From the moment you started editing, you strutted around like you were somehow the "senior" of new arrivals and people who made mistakes even though, at the time, you hadn't been here any a significantly longer time than them, stomping around giving people orders, and constantly going off explosively, unnecessarily angrily at the slightest thing. Yeah, y'know, you DID make many worthy contributions, and NOW, said consideration would be deserved, but as "new editor Peter Damian," no, that consideration is NOT deserved, and was identical to the way you acted when you first arrived, cluing me in right away. - Chris McFeely 13:45, 29 March 2011 (EDT)