User talk:RoboWarriorPrime

please please please stop uploading bad-looking images of character art --ItsWalky (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2019 (EST)

G1 Cartoon Ratchet's image that I've uploaded is very very very clear. More than the previous one. RoboWarriorPrime 09/02/2019

It was fan art. Someone had traced the actual model and colored it. --ItsWalky (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2019 (EST)

Cyberverse cast

PLEASE stop adding Blurr, Maccadam, etc. to the list of characters. As we say right at the top of the section, the list is only for recurring characters, i.e. those who have appeared in multiple episodes. The ones you keep adding have only appeared in a single episode apiece. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2019 (EST)

OK sorry and thanks for warning me.--RoboWarriorPrime (talk), 20 February 2019 (EST)

New images

Please remember to properly tag any new images you upload with the appropriate template. See our Help page for a list of templates for each series, and look at any of the other existing images for examples of how to properly tag them. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 20:08, 3 March 2019 (EST)

OK, sorry, I'm new and I don't know very well all. Thanks for the help page--RoboWarriorPrime (talk), 04 February 2019 (EST)

Cool off, please

I've blocked you from editing for 24 hours, please take the opportunity to cool off and return with a calmer mindset. As has been correctly pointed out to you, the note you were trying to add to Megatron's article was not useful, and arguing about it is not going to change that. You're also starting to get actively antagonistic towards other editors, which is not okay at all, as is removing jokes based on your personal sensibilities. Please note that if you attempt to bypass the 24 hour block by creating a new account, or if you continue behaving the same way after the 24 hours is up, you are liable to be blocked permanently. Thank you. Jalaguy (talk) 09:02, 7 July 2019 (EDT)

Do as you prefer, my opinions don't change. This is censorship. I'm not angry with the editors but with their edits. Today there's freedom of thought. RoboWarriorPrime (talk), 07 July 2019 (EST)

You're perfectly welcome to hold whatever opinions you like. Your opinions do not, however, entitle you to make whatever changes you like to the wiki, or to harass other editors when those changes are reverted. TFWiki is not an unmoderated free-for-all where anyone can change anything they like, and the idea that having your edits reverted is censorship or impinges on your freedom of thought is, quite frankly, laughable. Jalaguy (talk) 09:32, 7 July 2019 (EDT)

I'm NOT angry with the editors! RoboWarriorPrime (talk), 07 July 2019 (EST)

Regardless, your insistence here that you are in the right and "being censored" seems to show a poor attitude that is liable to get you permanently banned if you continue once you are unblocked. If I were you I would reconsider whether you want to die on this hill. --Riptide (talk) 12:24, 7 July 2019 (EDT)

Man and Machine

Please stop adding that pointless and twee over-linked note to the article. You have been reverted four times so far. Saix (talk) 09:05, 19 July 2019 (EDT)

There are lots of pointless notes in other pages. RoboWarriorPrime (talk) 09:10, 19 July 2019 (EDT)

Nobody is interested in playing this game. Stop adding the note. Saix (talk) 10:46, 19 July 2019 (EDT)

See? You are unfair, 'cause when you want to add pointless notes you can, but when I want too I cannot. I wonder why. RoboWarriorPrime (talk) 12:12, 19 July 2019 (EDT)

You seriously need to stop taking every revision so personally. Every one of us have added a bit that someone else thought was unnecessary. We discuss it, we rule with the general consensus, and we move on. The fact that you continue to insist you're in the right even when multiple people have reverted your note shows an unwillingness to work with others, and your antagonistic attitude isn't winning you any favors. You've already been penalized once for this; I would suggest you take some time to chill out and let it go before this escalates further and you risk getting into trouble again. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 12:23, 19 July 2019 (EDT)

I remember you that there are lots of pointless notes just fou fun. So there’s nothing wrong if I add it. Have you used the general consensus for the Axalon and Darksyde reference in Transformers: Devastation? I don't think, it's the same. I'm not angry, I'm just disappointed. No one here is aggressive.RoboWarriorPrime (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2019 (EDT)

Considering that note has been there for four years without anyone believing it was an issue, combined with the fact that it's a direct answer to a question posed in the game itself rather than trying to form a vague link between two completely different subjects, then yes, it's a worthwhile note. Also, using whataboutism is a poor way to try and argue for your note's inclusion. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2019 (EDT)

Well....at this point I understand that you are serching any possible way out in my answers only to contradict me. I'm very disappointed that you are so subjectives. It's useless talk with somebody who don't want to listen. Do what you want. RoboWarriorPrime (talk) 12:49, 19 July 2019 (EDT)