User talk:Vectorwing

Please stop branding every non-character drone an Autobot or a Decepticon. That's not how it works. Saix (talk) 19:45, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

He is right about some of them, though; you wouldn't remove a Vehicon symbol from the various drones there. Certainly, I don't think things like the Alligatorcon require it, but not everything he's added to is wrong. Escargon (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

Ah wait, nevermind, I thought you were talking about the faction symbols at the top of the page. Escargon (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

If it has a faction symbol it is only right that it should be on a decepticons or autobots list. Vectorwing

No, they're just associated with the factions. It's like the Ark or the Autobot code, they're Autobot related, but not Autobots. Tindalos (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

Battle Android Troopers are not Decepticons. Auto-Combatants are not Autobots. The Alligaticon is not a Decepticon. Stop adding this. - Chris McFeely (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

ok thank you for helping me understand Tindalos.Vectorwing

Stop adding categories if you're not competent at it. Saix (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

STOP

{{#if: Waspinatordawn.jpg | | }} {{ #if: You and Megatron have one thing in common. |You and Megatron have one thing in common. |}} Please proofread your contributions more thoroughly. By default, we require correct English in our articles, including correct spelling, punctuation, and use of capital letters. If your edits don't follow these rules, other editors may choose to revert them rather than spend their time cleaning up your mistakes. {{ #if: |{{ #if: |  | }} talk page.|}} {{#if: ||}}

{{#ifeq: User talk||}}{{#ifeq: User talk|File|}}

Ok but please let me add a few of them to decepticons like autoscout. Vectorwing

No. They aren't characters. And you really need to work on your grammar, spelling, and capitalization before you do any work here. --Khajidha (talk) 11:51, 28 March 2018 (EDT)

Then why is Apex Bomber considered an Autobot if he is a drone. If you can answer that then I will stop and do not tell me it is because he has more story. Vectorwing If we are also going down this path than why is Air Warrior considered a decepticon if it is a drone. Vectorwing

Nobody is obligated to entertain your arguments. If multiple people have reversed your edits, you are to stop. Saix (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2018 (EDT)

Don't know all the ins and outs of Apex Bomber, but Air Warriors aren't drones in all continuities. The classification of articles as drone vs. character has been examined by the community in all of these cases and they are in the categories we find proper. When your changes to those were reverted, you should have taken questions to the talk pages of each article instead of ignoring all the people who have opposed your changes or offered you advice on this talk page.--Khajidha (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2018 (EDT)

PS-I just thought of a reason Apex Bomber is categorized as an Autobot: Takara said so on his packaging.--Khajidha (talk) 13:18, 28 March 2018 (EDT)

Thank you Khajidha, I thought that since they had decepticon or Autobot insignias they should be categorized as one or the other.

STOP (part 2)

Please stop adding "Generation 1 characters" to the bottom of pages that already belong to one of that category's subcategories. We now have to remove all these. You have created an immense amount of work for us. --ItsWalky (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2018 (EDT)

STOP (part 3)

THERE IS A REASON THESE PAGES DO NOT HAVE THE MINI-CASSETTES CATEGORY --ItsWalky (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2018 (EDT)