Editing User talk:Vectorwing

Please stop branding every non-character drone an Autobot or a Decepticon. That's not how it works. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 19:45, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
:He is right about some of them, though; you wouldn't remove a Vehicon symbol from the various drones there. Certainly, I don't think things like the Alligatorcon require it, but not everything he's added to is wrong. [[User:Escargon|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon|talk]]) 19:49, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
:Ah wait, nevermind, I thought you were talking about the faction symbols at the top of the page. [[User:Escargon|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon|talk]]) 19:50, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
If it has a faction symbol it is only right that it should be on a decepticons or autobots list.  [[User:Vectorwing|Vectorwing]]
:No, they're just associated with the factions. It's like the Ark or the Autobot code, they're Autobot related, but not Autobots. [[User:Tindalos|Tindalos]] ([[User talk:Tindalos|talk]]) 21:23, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

Battle Android Troopers are not Decepticons. Auto-Combatants are not Autobots. The Alligaticon is not a Decepticon. Stop adding this. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely|talk]]) 21:21, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

ok thank you for helping me understand Tindalos.[[User:Vectorwing|Vectorwing]]
:Stop adding categories if you're not competent at it. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 22:27, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

== STOP ==

{{correctenglish}}

Ok but please let me add a few of them to decepticons like autoscout. [[User:Vectorwing|Vectorwing]]
:No. They aren't characters. And you really need to work on your grammar, spelling, and capitalization before you do any work here. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 11:51, 28 March 2018 (EDT)
Then why is [[Apex Bomber]] considered an Autobot if he is a drone. If you can answer that then I will stop and do not tell me it is because he has more story. [[User:Vectorwing|Vectorwing]]	
If we are also going down this path than why is [[Air Warrior]] considered a decepticon if it is a drone. [[User:Vectorwing|Vectorwing]]
:Nobody is obligated to entertain your arguments. If multiple people have reversed your edits, you are to stop. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 12:02, 28 March 2018 (EDT)
:Don't know all the ins and outs of Apex Bomber, but Air Warriors aren't drones in all continuities. The classification of articles as drone vs. character has been examined by the community in all of these cases and they are in the categories we find proper. When your changes to those were reverted, you should have taken questions to the talk pages of each article instead of ignoring all the people who have opposed your changes or offered you advice on this talk page.--[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 13:17, 28 March 2018 (EDT)
:PS-I just thought of a reason Apex Bomber is categorized as an Autobot: Takara said so on his packaging.--[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 13:18, 28 March 2018 (EDT)

Thank you [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]], I thought that since they had decepticon or Autobot insignias they should be categorized as one or the other.

== STOP (part 2)==

Please stop adding "Generation 1 characters" to the bottom of pages that already belong to one of that category's subcategories.  We now have to remove all these.  You have created an immense amount of work for us.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky|talk]]) 21:36, 29 March 2018 (EDT)

== STOP (part 3)==

THERE IS A REASON THESE PAGES DO NOT HAVE THE MINI-CASSETTES CATEGORY --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky|talk]]) 23:21, 6 April 2018 (EDT)