User talk:Jalaguy/RID by year: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search Created page with "I really don't think a split-by-year is needed. It's not like the line changed significantly across that boundary. Compressing it all will fill up blank space AND keep the TOC..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I really don't think a split-by-year is needed. It's not like the line changed significantly across that boundary. Compressing it all will fill up blank space AND keep the TOC from being three screens long. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 19:50, 9 October 2016 (EDT) | I really don't think a split-by-year is needed. It's not like the line changed significantly across that boundary. Compressing it all will fill up blank space AND keep the TOC from being three screens long. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 19:50, 9 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
:Yeah, my initial motivation was making things feel more chronological, without an odd sort of mishmash of newer/temporary size classes at the bottom, but the giant TOC ''is'' super-hideous and, yeah, it ought to solve the spacing in quite a few places. I'll take a stab re-jigging it tomorrow. [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy|talk]]) 19:59, 9 October 2016 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:00, 10 October 2016
I really don't think a split-by-year is needed. It's not like the line changed significantly across that boundary. Compressing it all will fill up blank space AND keep the TOC from being three screens long. --M Sipher (talk) 19:50, 9 October 2016 (EDT)
- Yeah, my initial motivation was making things feel more chronological, without an odd sort of mishmash of newer/temporary size classes at the bottom, but the giant TOC is super-hideous and, yeah, it ought to solve the spacing in quite a few places. I'll take a stab re-jigging it tomorrow. Jalaguy (talk) 19:59, 9 October 2016 (EDT)
