Talk:Cybernet Space Cube: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can I suggest a | Can I suggest a "Category: Magic"? It's of limited enough scope that creating it would be useful. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 02:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
:What does that have to do with the Cybernet Space Cube? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 02:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | :What does that have to do with the Cybernet Space Cube? --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 02:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Also, I wouldn't think it rates a category. A [[magic]] article, certainly. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 02:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ::Also, I wouldn't think it rates a category. A [[magic]] article, certainly. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 02:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::It does not. That's clearly figurative language. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ::It does not. That's clearly figurative language. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::The only actual line of dialog we have about the cube, and you want to write it off as metaphor. | :::The only actual line of dialog we have about the cube, and you want to write it off as metaphor. | ||
:::Fine, it's sufficiently advanced technology that is indistinguishable from | :::Fine, it's sufficiently advanced technology that is ''indistinguishable'' from magic. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 04:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
It never showed up, but at least at one point Glen was going to use the Cybernet SPace Cube as the news-entity Rook represented. -[[User:LV|LV]] 03:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | It never showed up, but at least at one point Glen was going to use the Cybernet SPace Cube as the news-entity Rook represented. -[[User:LV|LV]] 03:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
I distinctly remember switching past Transformers watching TV as a kid - *hides from G1 purist mob* - because of this annoying cube! My bf told me it was just a figment of my imagination; no such "evil cube" existed. Thank you Teletraan for proving him wrong! --[[User:Nightshade83|Nightshade83]] 22:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
* [[User:Nightshade83|Nightshade83]], I don't blame you at all - the Cube WAS super-annoying. I was so happy when I could finally get TF DVDs without them, instead of my creaky cube-ravaged VCR tapes. /old [[User:Bzero|Bzero]] 13:50, 25 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Having rewritten the intro with a more in-universe POV a short while back, I think we can remove the cleanup tag. Any objections to my doing so? [[User:Banpei the Mini-Con|Banpei the Mini-Con]] ([[User talk:Banpei the Mini-Con|talk]]) 14:15, 25 August 2022 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 25 August 2022
Can I suggest a "Category: Magic"? It's of limited enough scope that creating it would be useful. -Derik 02:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- What does that have to do with the Cybernet Space Cube? --KilMichaelMcC 02:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I wouldn't think it rates a category. A magic article, certainly. --KilMichaelMcC 02:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- The Cybernet spacecube is magic. Says so right int he opening narration. -Derik 02:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
It never showed up, but at least at one point Glen was going to use the Cybernet SPace Cube as the news-entity Rook represented. -LV 03:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I distinctly remember switching past Transformers watching TV as a kid - *hides from G1 purist mob* - because of this annoying cube! My bf told me it was just a figment of my imagination; no such "evil cube" existed. Thank you Teletraan for proving him wrong! --Nightshade83 22:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nightshade83, I don't blame you at all - the Cube WAS super-annoying. I was so happy when I could finally get TF DVDs without them, instead of my creaky cube-ravaged VCR tapes. /old Bzero 13:50, 25 October 2012 (EDT)
Having rewritten the intro with a more in-universe POV a short while back, I think we can remove the cleanup tag. Any objections to my doing so? Banpei the Mini-Con (talk) 14:15, 25 August 2022 (EDT)
