Talk:Neo-Knights: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m →Untitled: clean up, replaced: [[Wrecker| → [[Wreckers| |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Untitled== | |||
I guess this should be moved to [[Neo-Knight]], what with being plural. But it seems so wrong. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 20:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | I guess this should be moved to [[Neo-Knight]], what with being plural. But it seems so wrong. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 20:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
I think it should be an exception, kinda like [[ | I think it should be an exception, kinda like [[Wreckers]] is.--[[User:DrSpengler|DrSpengler]] 20:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
...would you list the Boston Celtics as the Boston Celtic? The X-Men as the X-Man? | ...would you list the Boston Celtics as the Boston Celtic? The X-Men as the X-Man? | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
The Neo-Knights are reprinted in [[Classic Transformers Volume 5]]. The only one that is attributed as a Marvel property is Circuit Breaker. Should we remove the rest from [[:Category: Marvel properties]]? - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 12:37, 7 January 2010 (EST) | The Neo-Knights are reprinted in [[Classic Transformers Volume 5]]. The only one that is attributed as a Marvel property is Circuit Breaker. Should we remove the rest from [[:Category: Marvel properties]]? - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 12:37, 7 January 2010 (EST) | ||
: I don't think it should have ever been there. The Neo-Knights' first appearances were in a Transformers book. The "Neo-Knights" book that the team would have spawned was reportedly similar-but-retooled characters, not these guys. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 12:41, 7 January 2010 (EST) | : I don't think it should have ever been there. The Neo-Knights' first appearances were in a Transformers book. The "Neo-Knights" book that the team would have spawned was reportedly similar-but-retooled characters, not these guys. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 12:41, 7 January 2010 (EST) | ||
::They were listed as Marvel properties after it was noticed that the indicia in their original appearances claims them as such, as was pointed out [[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/User_talk:SanityOrMadness#.22Marvel_Properties.22 over here]] back in May. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 14:07, 7 January 2010 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:57, 20 January 2023
Untitled
[edit]I guess this should be moved to Neo-Knight, what with being plural. But it seems so wrong. --ItsWalky 20:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
I think it should be an exception, kinda like Wreckers is.--DrSpengler 20:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
...would you list the Boston Celtics as the Boston Celtic? The X-Men as the X-Man?
The PROPER TEAM NAME is Plural. We dont' list the Transfomers cartoon as 'Transformer,' because the name of the cartoon (and franchise, and whatever) was never 'Transformer.'
The name is plural. Team names are often plural. Keep them thus. -Derik 04:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, Neo-Knights is the actual team name, not like Quintesson, which is the name of a species. Interrobang 14:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Marvel Properties?
[edit]The Neo-Knights are reprinted in Classic Transformers Volume 5. The only one that is attributed as a Marvel property is Circuit Breaker. Should we remove the rest from Category: Marvel properties? - Starfield 12:37, 7 January 2010 (EST)
- I don't think it should have ever been there. The Neo-Knights' first appearances were in a Transformers book. The "Neo-Knights" book that the team would have spawned was reportedly similar-but-retooled characters, not these guys. --ItsWalky 12:41, 7 January 2010 (EST)
- They were listed as Marvel properties after it was noticed that the indicia in their original appearances claims them as such, as was pointed out [over here] back in May. --KilMichaelMcC 14:07, 7 January 2010 (EST)
