Talk:Thulsa Doom: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Detour (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Bluestreak7 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm inclined to question the need for articles about each of the moons when all we can say about them is the same one sentence. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 05:18, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
I'm inclined to question the need for articles about each of the moons when all we can say about them is the same one sentence. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 05:18, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
:I'm inclined to agree. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 06:21, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
:I'm inclined to agree. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 06:21, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
::Agreed.  They should just be subheadings of this page.  --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 10:04, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
:::Yeah, there's no actual content there. If we have a link somewhere, we should expect something more, but we from linking here we already know its a moon, so it's just redundant information. --[[User:Bluestreak7|Bluestreak7]] 10:27, 12 August 2010 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 14:27, 12 August 2010

I'm inclined to question the need for articles about each of the moons when all we can say about them is the same one sentence. - Chris McFeely 05:18, 12 August 2010 (EDT)

I'm inclined to agree. --Detour 06:21, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
Agreed. They should just be subheadings of this page. --Thylacine 2000 10:04, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
Yeah, there's no actual content there. If we have a link somewhere, we should expect something more, but we from linking here we already know its a moon, so it's just redundant information. --Bluestreak7 10:27, 12 August 2010 (EDT)