Category talk:Dreamwave titles: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Historically, the category wasn't ''needed'' for Marvel as there was only the US ongoing, the UK ongoing, and Gen 2. | Historically, the category wasn't ''needed'' for Marvel as there was only the US ongoing, the UK ongoing, and Gen 2. | ||
However both Dreamwave and IDW have been reluctant to take the plunge into ongoings for the most part, and thus have a good baker's dozen of miniseries titles apiece.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 16:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | However both Dreamwave and IDW have been reluctant to take the plunge into ongoings for the most part, and thus have a good baker's dozen of miniseries titles apiece.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 16:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:14, 24 March 2009
Historically, we have not had a category layer between "Comics" and a given title. I.e., there is no "Marvel titles" category; all Marvel titles are listed under "Comics". Should this category exist? JW 15:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Biased, I say yes ;-) There are enough entries to warrant a category and I propose one as well for IDW titles. It's a good way to organize the bloated "Comics" cat. Marvel titles are iffy, but there may even be enough there if we wanted to separate them out as G1US, G1UK, Headmasters, GIJoe1, GIJoe2, G2, Universe, and I may be forgetting one. Of course a cat for shorties like Blackthorne titles - I say NAY! --MistaTee 15:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Historically, the category wasn't needed for Marvel as there was only the US ongoing, the UK ongoing, and Gen 2.
However both Dreamwave and IDW have been reluctant to take the plunge into ongoings for the most part, and thus have a good baker's dozen of miniseries titles apiece.--Rosicrucian 16:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
