Category talk:Transmetals 2: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Bother. Awfully non-instinctive isn't it? Articles must reflect proper notation, but do we want to for cat's? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 02:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | :::Bother. Awfully non-instinctive isn't it? Articles must reflect proper notation, but do we want to for cat's? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 02:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::''"The packaging itself says 'Transmetals 2'. "'' I'll grit my teeth and bear it, then. [[User:JW|JW]] 02:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ::::''"The packaging itself says 'Transmetals 2'. "'' I'll grit my teeth and bear it, then. [[User:JW|JW]] 02:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::"Transmetals 2" is also correct English. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | :::::"Transmetals 2" is also correct English. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::::Cite? [[User:JW|JW]] 04:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I dunno about a citation, but I would assume Transmetals 2 to be proper English, along the lines of "courts martial," "mothers-in-law," "Attorneys General" and so forth. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 04:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:As noted above, "Transmetals 2" would be the appropriate English way of writing it, even in the absence of any packaging copy that gives us a "canonical" plural form. So, yeah, no change. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 04:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:05, 24 March 2009
Shouldn't this category's name be "Transmetal 2s"? JW 01:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- I hadn't noticed... but yeah. --M Sipher 01:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- User:DiagnosticDrone says to leave a note for User:Steve-o requesting a mass-edit change. I'll do it. -Derik 01:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC) I'll do it.
- The packaging itself says "Transmetals 2". —Interrobang 02:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- User:DiagnosticDrone says to leave a note for User:Steve-o requesting a mass-edit change. I'll do it. -Derik 01:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC) I'll do it.
- Bother. Awfully non-instinctive isn't it? Articles must reflect proper notation, but do we want to for cat's? -Derik 02:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- "The packaging itself says 'Transmetals 2'. " I'll grit my teeth and bear it, then. JW 02:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- "Transmetals 2" is also correct English. --ItsWalky 03:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cite? JW 04:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno about a citation, but I would assume Transmetals 2 to be proper English, along the lines of "courts martial," "mothers-in-law," "Attorneys General" and so forth. --KilMichaelMcC 04:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cite? JW 04:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- "Transmetals 2" is also correct English. --ItsWalky 03:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- "The packaging itself says 'Transmetals 2'. " I'll grit my teeth and bear it, then. JW 02:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Bother. Awfully non-instinctive isn't it? Articles must reflect proper notation, but do we want to for cat's? -Derik 02:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- As noted above, "Transmetals 2" would be the appropriate English way of writing it, even in the absence of any packaging copy that gives us a "canonical" plural form. So, yeah, no change. --Steve-o 04:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
