Template talk:Recycle: Difference between revisions
New page: Idle thought after looking at the "Starscream" Cyb episode page. "Cleanup" doesn't cut it when a page is clearly as useless as that. There's nothing to clean, only a little bit of shit to ... |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Idle thought after looking at the "Starscream" Cyb episode page. "Cleanup" doesn't cut it when a page is clearly as useless as that. There's nothing to clean, only a little bit of shit to sweep away before you start over from scratch. But the Deletion template makes it seem like we don't want ANY page under that name, which isn't true and leads to confusion for new people.<br> | Idle thought after looking at the "Starscream" Cyb episode page. "Cleanup" doesn't cut it when a page is clearly as useless as that. There's nothing to clean, only a little bit of shit to sweep away before you start over from scratch. But the Deletion template makes it seem like we don't want ANY page under that name, which isn't true and leads to confusion for new people.<br> | ||
So perhaps a "Recycle" template is in order? It would still place the article in the "to be deleted" category as "tobedeleted" does, but the template itself would clarify that while we do need an article under this name, the current one needs to completely scrapped and redone from the ground up, and until that point, should be deleted because what's there NOW is completely worthless and looks awful. Give the template a close-up of a smirking Dinobot and the quote "You will be recycled with full honors".<br> | So perhaps a "Recycle" template is in order? It would still place the article in the "to be deleted" category as "tobedeleted" does, but the template itself would clarify that while we do need an article under this name, the current one needs to completely scrapped and redone from the ground up, and until that point, should be deleted because what's there NOW is completely worthless and looks awful. Give the template a close-up of a smirking Dinobot and the quote "You will be recycled with full honors".<br> | ||
And while I'm thinking about it... perhaps a "Standards Bastard" template for those who make pages that don't conform to our page layouts, or mess up pages by slapping in bad images and text? Maybe with RID Prowl and some rule quote? Or T-AI with something about protocol? --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 16:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | And while I'm thinking about it... perhaps a "Standards Bastard" template for those who make pages that don't conform to our page layouts, or mess up pages by slapping in bad images and text? Maybe with RID Prowl and some rule quote? Or T-AI with something about protocol? --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 16:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Sounds good to me! --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 17:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{Messagebox| | |||
|message_text=Though an article on this subject is needed, the current version is so far below the basic standards established by '''{{SITENAME}}''' that it needs to be redone from scratch. If a re-work is not enacted immediately, this article will be deleted, as we would rather have ''no'' article than one this far from our standards in order to maintain a baseline quality. | |||
|header=You will be recycled with full honors. | |||
|image_name= | |||
|categories=<includeonly>[[Category:To be deleted]]</includeonly> | |||
|mouseover="BRUTALLY!" | |||
|image_width= | |||
|border=aaa | |||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 | |||
|width=90% | |||
|bottomtext={{#if: {{{1|}}}|'''Reason:''' {{{1|}}} |}} | |||
}} | |||
That work for wording? I'm in no position to get a suitable screen grab right now... I definitely want robot-mode Dinobot smirking. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 19:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:How about Dinobot right after he falls at the end of CoH, slack-jawed and half dead? The point is "article go bye-bye." --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 20:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Do we have a page outlining what our standards ''are'' for use withthe standards bastard template? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 20:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
::The Style Guide is less comprehensive than I remember it being. It should at least point to a complete character, episode and comic page each. Also, it seems to be missing the "in-universe" deal. We should probably revamp this. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 20:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:16, 24 March 2009
Idle thought after looking at the "Starscream" Cyb episode page. "Cleanup" doesn't cut it when a page is clearly as useless as that. There's nothing to clean, only a little bit of shit to sweep away before you start over from scratch. But the Deletion template makes it seem like we don't want ANY page under that name, which isn't true and leads to confusion for new people.
So perhaps a "Recycle" template is in order? It would still place the article in the "to be deleted" category as "tobedeleted" does, but the template itself would clarify that while we do need an article under this name, the current one needs to completely scrapped and redone from the ground up, and until that point, should be deleted because what's there NOW is completely worthless and looks awful. Give the template a close-up of a smirking Dinobot and the quote "You will be recycled with full honors".
And while I'm thinking about it... perhaps a "Standards Bastard" template for those who make pages that don't conform to our page layouts, or mess up pages by slapping in bad images and text? Maybe with RID Prowl and some rule quote? Or T-AI with something about protocol? --M Sipher 16:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me! --FFN 17:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
That work for wording? I'm in no position to get a suitable screen grab right now... I definitely want robot-mode Dinobot smirking. --M Sipher 19:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- How about Dinobot right after he falls at the end of CoH, slack-jawed and half dead? The point is "article go bye-bye." --Thylacine 2000 20:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Do we have a page outlining what our standards are for use withthe standards bastard template? -Derik 20:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- The Style Guide is less comprehensive than I remember it being. It should at least point to a complete character, episode and comic page each. Also, it seems to be missing the "in-universe" deal. We should probably revamp this. --M Sipher 20:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
