File talk:Cycle drone with extractor.jpg: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure what could possibly be done to improve this image. It's a screencap I took from the DVD, cropped the junk out of, and lightened up a bit to make the extractor visible. There is no "better source" as the template asks for. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 05:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | I'm not sure what could possibly be done to improve this image. It's a screencap I took from the DVD, cropped the junk out of, and lightened up a bit to make the extractor visible. There is no "better source" as the template asks for. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 05:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:You gotta admit, the upper half of the picture is really the only part that is visible. I can't tell if there is one or two Cycle drones there. -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 06:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | :You gotta admit, the upper half of the picture is really the only part that is visible. I can't tell if there is one or two Cycle drones there. -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 06:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::What's with all the image artifacts? --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 06:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I too see quite a bit of artifacting in the image. --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 07:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::I see alot of it. I think this needs to go back to whatever dark image it was before. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 16:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
::There is pretty clearly only one drone. I am guessing that what you think might is another drone is the one's lowered left arm. Brightening the image *did* bring out artifacts, but that was the only way to get the extractor clearly visible. Regardless, I invite anybody to try to come up with a better screencap of an extractor showing the full device clearly, preferably with a character for scale. The [[:Image:Jetstorm with extractor.jpg]] picture Interrobang uploaded is no good because it's so dark. I tried brightening it a little and it ended up looking worse than the Cycle Drone picture, but maybe somebody else is more skilled at that than me. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 14:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:22, 25 March 2009
I'm not sure what could possibly be done to improve this image. It's a screencap I took from the DVD, cropped the junk out of, and lightened up a bit to make the extractor visible. There is no "better source" as the template asks for. --Steve-o 05:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- You gotta admit, the upper half of the picture is really the only part that is visible. I can't tell if there is one or two Cycle drones there. -- SFH 06:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- What's with all the image artifacts? --FFN 06:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- There is pretty clearly only one drone. I am guessing that what you think might is another drone is the one's lowered left arm. Brightening the image *did* bring out artifacts, but that was the only way to get the extractor clearly visible. Regardless, I invite anybody to try to come up with a better screencap of an extractor showing the full device clearly, preferably with a character for scale. The Image:Jetstorm with extractor.jpg picture Interrobang uploaded is no good because it's so dark. I tried brightening it a little and it ended up looking worse than the Cycle Drone picture, but maybe somebody else is more skilled at that than me. --Steve-o 14:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
