Talk:Light-piping: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) Is Movie Ironhide's light-piping really "disabled"? |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Is Movie Ironhide's light-piping really "disabled"? == | == Is Movie Ironhide's light-piping really "disabled"? == | ||
Personally upon looking at this it seems less "disabled" and more that it was engineered in there and then used in conjunction with a translucent plastic color that really isn't conducive to light piping. A poor choice yes, but no more "disabled" than Movie Arcee's semi-functioning light-piping gimmick.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | Personally upon looking at this it seems less "disabled" and more that it was engineered in there and then used in conjunction with a translucent plastic color that really isn't conducive to light piping. A poor choice yes, but no more "disabled" than Movie Arcee's semi-functioning light-piping gimmick.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 23 March 2009
Is Movie Ironhide's light-piping really "disabled"?
[edit]Personally upon looking at this it seems less "disabled" and more that it was engineered in there and then used in conjunction with a translucent plastic color that really isn't conducive to light piping. A poor choice yes, but no more "disabled" than Movie Arcee's semi-functioning light-piping gimmick.--RosicrucianTalk 00:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
