Talk:Power Master: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
FFN (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Deceptitran (talk | contribs)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
:I think it does avoid a fair amount of confusion and explaining, as we have Powermasters, Power Masters, and Powered Masters.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
:I think it does avoid a fair amount of confusion and explaining, as we have Powermasters, Power Masters, and Powered Masters.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
::But the title disambuig is only for keeping different articles from colliding. The "''_____ is a ______ from the ______ continuity''" We don't need the stuff in the paranthesis unless there is another article titled "Power Master" exactly. Therefore, I'm moving the article. --[[User:FortMax|FortMax]] 15:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
::But the title disambuig is only for keeping different articles from colliding. The "''_____ is a ______ from the ______ continuity''" We don't need the stuff in the paranthesis unless there is another article titled "Power Master" exactly. Therefore, I'm moving the article. --[[User:FortMax|FortMax]] 15:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
==Cleanup==
This is just a reminder for Might Gaine - we usually try to avoid using acronyms such as "G1" or "G2" with such regularity in the articles themselves, since it's not really very helpful to more casual readers or newcomers even if "we all know" what they mean. Also, when speaking of the brand names of things such as ''Transformers'' (the toy brand) or franchises such as ''Generation 2'', we put them in italics. This includes brands and franchises not associated with Transformers, such as ''Gundam''. We should also link names and terms that have articles (or warrant a future article) in the first instance we come to them in this article.
I would also question the tone a little, and I edited the suspicion about them not being engineered by Takara by saying there is no hard evidence to confirm or deny it, which we should really point out for our fandom-created 'suspicions' just so we're not talking out of arses. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 15:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Latest revision as of 12:16, 27 March 2009

Do we really need the (G2)?

[edit]

Since the G1 figures were "Powermasters", we don't need the "(G2)" unless there's some other "Power Master" I'm forgetting about. --FortMax 14:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I think it does avoid a fair amount of confusion and explaining, as we have Powermasters, Power Masters, and Powered Masters.--RosicrucianTalk 15:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
But the title disambuig is only for keeping different articles from colliding. The "_____ is a ______ from the ______ continuity" We don't need the stuff in the paranthesis unless there is another article titled "Power Master" exactly. Therefore, I'm moving the article. --FortMax 15:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)