Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF): Difference between revisions
m Abates moved page Talk:Depthcharge to Talk:Depthcharge (ROTF) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Caption== | ==Caption== | ||
(Reply and explain to the edit summary in the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&action=history history page].) | (Reply and explain to the edit summary in the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&action=history history page].) | ||
I use the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&diff=302827&oldid=302826 caption] is a ''ROTF''-reference | I use the [http://tfwiki.net/w2/index.php?title=Depthcharge&diff=302827&oldid=302826 caption] is a ''ROTF''-reference — the scene in which the US aircraft carrier gets hit and destroyed by the Decepticon Protoform meteorites. Because I don't have the screencap of the scene, I use <nowiki>[[Protoform|meteorite]]</nowiki> instead. :) --'''[[User:TX55|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 10:19, 31 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
:There's not that much of a connection. The transition didn't hit whatever type of ship Depthcharge transforms into. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 10:33, 31 May 2009 (EDT) | :There's not that much of a connection. The transition didn't hit whatever type of ship Depthcharge transforms into. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 10:33, 31 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT) | So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_LCS_Lockheed_Concept_Cutaway_lg.jpg Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship] with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--[[User:MCRG Again|MCRG Again]] 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT) | :At least [http://www.eyrie.org/~dvandom/BW/RotF/Scout1 one person] agrees with you.--[[User:Apcog|Apcog]] 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
::In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--[[User:MCRG Again|MCRG Again]] 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT) | |||
::The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--[[User:Tristan 38935|Tristan 38935]] 10:59, 11 April (EDT) | |||
Actually, I think his toy is probably based on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_class_littoral_combat_ship ''Freedom'' class], but this is a more substantial change than dropping the inaccurate ''Visby'' note. Thoughts? -[[User:LV|LV]] 11:04, 30 March 2011 (EDT) | |||
== Move to Depthcharge (ROTF) == | |||
I agree with that suggestion, he's not the only "Depthcharge without a space in the middle". I guess I can move it if there's no objection. (Actually have been wanting to move this page for a while.[[User:Item42|Item42]] 04:47, 12 June 2010 (EDT) | |||
:Move it. --[[User:-Blackout-|-Blackout-]] 04:53, 12 June 2010 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:52, 30 December 2016
Caption
[edit](Reply and explain to the edit summary in the history page.) I use the caption is a ROTF-reference — the scene in which the US aircraft carrier gets hit and destroyed by the Decepticon Protoform meteorites. Because I don't have the screencap of the scene, I use [[Protoform|meteorite]] instead. :) --TX55TALK 10:19, 31 May 2009 (EDT)
- There's not that much of a connection. The transition didn't hit whatever type of ship Depthcharge transforms into. --FFN 10:33, 31 May 2009 (EDT)
Oh, I just use the caption to say that Depthcharge won't be "soft" as the unlucky carrier. ('Course just a joke in caption, not in fiction.) --TX55TALK 12:01, 31 May 2009 (EDT)
Vehicle Type
[edit]So I've been trying to dig up exactly what Depthcharge is since all the ROTF Scouts seem to be slightly modified versions of real/concept vehicles and I think he may be a Lockheed Littoral Combat Ship with missile racks instead of a helicopter deck. I'm not certain enough to add it the article though. Thoughts?--MCRG Again 12:33, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
- At least one person agrees with you.--Apcog 13:12, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
- In that case, I believe I'll add it until someone finds otherwise. Huzzah, information!--MCRG Again 17:40, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
- The page should be moved to Depththcharge (ROFT).--Tristan 38935 10:59, 11 April (EDT)
Actually, I think his toy is probably based on the Freedom class, but this is a more substantial change than dropping the inaccurate Visby note. Thoughts? -LV 11:04, 30 March 2011 (EDT)
Move to Depthcharge (ROTF)
[edit]I agree with that suggestion, he's not the only "Depthcharge without a space in the middle". I guess I can move it if there's no objection. (Actually have been wanting to move this page for a while.Item42 04:47, 12 June 2010 (EDT)
- Move it. ---Blackout- 04:53, 12 June 2010 (EDT)
