Talk:Primus apotheosis: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sooo...where does this description come from? [[User:Gearbox|Gearbox]] | Sooo...where does this description come from? [[User:Gearbox|Gearbox]] | ||
:Pyro's profile in Issue 5 of Last Stand of the Wreckers.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT) | :Pyro's profile in Issue 5 of Last Stand of the Wreckers.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
I really wanna add [[Overload (G1)|Overload]] to the list of possible sufferers. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 14:08, 19 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
:Would Optimus Primal or [[Primal Prime]] count?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.196|192.249.47.196]] 16:04, 17 November 2011 (EST) | |||
::The latter I don't agree with because I'm pretty sure one isn't considered a "wannabe Prime" if they're ''created from the Matrix itself''. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 16:08, 17 November 2011 (EST) | |||
:::I thought this was about specifically emulating Optimus. Is it just "a Prime" instead?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.196|192.249.47.196]] 16:55, 17 November 2011 (EST) | |||
If a decepticon can have it, wouldn't Archforce suffer from it? ([[Special:Contributions/184.56.19.73|184.56.19.73]] 13:54, 10 December 2011 (EST)) | |||
:No, he likely has a related condition at the opposite end of the spectrum. After all, he's emulating Megatron rather than Optimus Prime.[[User:Nemesis Primal|Nemesis Primal]] ([[User talk:Nemesis Primal|talk]]) 04:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:39, 3 April 2014
Sooo...where does this description come from? Gearbox
- Pyro's profile in Issue 5 of Last Stand of the Wreckers.--RosicrucianTalk 18:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
I really wanna add Overload to the list of possible sufferers. --Detour 14:08, 19 April 2011 (EDT)
- Would Optimus Primal or Primal Prime count?192.249.47.196 16:04, 17 November 2011 (EST)
- The latter I don't agree with because I'm pretty sure one isn't considered a "wannabe Prime" if they're created from the Matrix itself. --ItsWalky 16:08, 17 November 2011 (EST)
- I thought this was about specifically emulating Optimus. Is it just "a Prime" instead?192.249.47.196 16:55, 17 November 2011 (EST)
- The latter I don't agree with because I'm pretty sure one isn't considered a "wannabe Prime" if they're created from the Matrix itself. --ItsWalky 16:08, 17 November 2011 (EST)
If a decepticon can have it, wouldn't Archforce suffer from it? (184.56.19.73 13:54, 10 December 2011 (EST))
- No, he likely has a related condition at the opposite end of the spectrum. After all, he's emulating Megatron rather than Optimus Prime.Nemesis Primal (talk) 04:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
