Talk:Grabber: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Deceptitran (talk | contribs)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
we have cartoon-only categories, and video game only categoris- shoudl there be a 'non-toy' category?  I think that's relevant to some people's search/interest patterns.
we have cartoon-only categories, and video game only categoris- shoudl there be a 'non-toy' category?  I think that's relevant to some people's search/interest patterns.
:I'll allow it.  [[Catagory: Non-toy characters]], it is.  Though should we include humans, too?  That's, you know, nearly all of them.<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>
:Actually, I change my mind.  Cartoon-only, comic-only, and video-game only ARE already non-toy character categories.  So no.  Redundant.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 05:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
::Add a prose-only category, and we cover all our bases.  We can throw the UK text story characters in there with the Legends doofs. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 05:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 
:::That's probabyl better.  Non-toy is problematic.  Megatrojn had several incarnations that had no toy- does that make HIM a non-toy character?  Surely not.  (They're non-toy incarnations...)
:::This dodges that entirely. I approve. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:48, 24 March 2009

we have cartoon-only categories, and video game only categoris- shoudl there be a 'non-toy' category? I think that's relevant to some people's search/interest patterns.

Actually, I change my mind. Cartoon-only, comic-only, and video-game only ARE already non-toy character categories. So no. Redundant. --ItsWalky 05:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Add a prose-only category, and we cover all our bases. We can throw the UK text story characters in there with the Legends doofs. --ItsWalky 05:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
That's probabyl better. Non-toy is problematic. Megatrojn had several incarnations that had no toy- does that make HIM a non-toy character? Surely not. (They're non-toy incarnations...)
This dodges that entirely. I approve. -Derik 06:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)